Two Root Two, Priced: Every Principle That Claims the Tsirelson Bound

There is a number that nature respects and no principle has yet earned. Two parties, each choosing between two measurements with two outcomes, can correlate their results up to a strength the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt ledger records as S. Classical physics — any local, realistic bookkeeping — caps the ledger at S = 2. Quantum mechanics permits S up to 2√2 ≈ 2.828, Tsirelson's bound, and not a hair more. Pure logic permits 4: the Popescu-Rohrlich box, a hypothetical device that violates no rule of relativity — it cannot signal — and still correlates at the algebraic maximum. So the world sits at 2.828, between the 2 it could have kept and the 4 it could have spent, and the question "Why there?" is one of the deepest open accounts in the foundations of physics. This paper runs my ledger's standard instrument over that account: a census. Every principal principle that has been offered as the reason for the bound is entered in the table, its claim stated at full strength, and its price read off — what it actually proves, and what it merely assumes. The findings: no-signaling alone fails by the full width of the gap; nontrivial communication complexity prices a bound at 3.27, not 2.83; information causality recovers 2√2 exactly, but only in the limit of its own protocol, only on the CHSH face, and only by assuming itself and its information calculus; macroscopic locality recovers 2√2 exactly at the CHSH face, while provably overshooting the quantum set everywhere else; local orthogonality, the census's most instructive failure, provably stops above the quantum set even with infinitely many copies; and quantum mechanics itself, the one entry that prints the number as a theorem, prints it from a formalism — tensor products and the Born rule — that assumes the structure whose strength was the question. The number is fenced on three sides and owned by none. Grade: THE BOUND IS SURROUNDED, NOT DERIVED. This paper stands outside my corpus's vacuum ledger; it neither spends that ledger nor repairs it.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23910948
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Two Root Two, Priced: Every Principle That Claims the Tsirelson Bound

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
preprint

Two Root Two, Priced: Every Principle That Claims the Tsirelson Bound

William Alexander Aldred
preprint en

Abstract

There is a number that nature respects and no principle has yet earned. Two parties, each choosing between two measurements with two outcomes, can correlate their results up to a strength the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt ledger records as S. Classical physics — any local, realistic bookkeeping — caps the ledger at S = 2. Quantum mechanics permits S up to 2√2 ≈ 2.828, Tsirelson's bound, and not a hair more. Pure logic permits 4: the Popescu-Rohrlich box, a hypothetical device that violates no rule of relativity — it cannot signal — and still correlates at the algebraic maximum. So the world sits at 2.828, between the 2 it could have kept and the 4 it could have spent, and the question "Why there?" is one of the deepest open accounts in the foundations of physics. This paper runs my ledger's standard instrument over that account: a census. Every principal principle that has been offered as the reason for the bound is entered in the table, its claim stated at full strength, and its price read off — what it actually proves, and what it merely assumes. The findings: no-signaling alone fails by the full width of the gap; nontrivial communication complexity prices a bound at 3.27, not 2.83; information causality recovers 2√2 exactly, but only in the limit of its own protocol, only on the CHSH face, and only by assuming itself and its information calculus; macroscopic locality recovers 2√2 exactly at the CHSH face, while provably overshooting the quantum set everywhere else; local orthogonality, the census's most instructive failure, provably stops above the quantum set even with infinitely many copies; and quantum mechanics itself, the one entry that prints the number as a theorem, prints it from a formalism — tensor products and the Born rule — that assumes the structure whose strength was the question. The number is fenced on three sides and owned by none. Grade: THE BOUND IS SURROUNDED, NOT DERIVED. This paper stands outside my corpus's vacuum ledger; it neither spends that ledger nor repairs it.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon