Perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation for the prevention of postoperative delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background: Postoperative delirium is a common perioperative complication. Early randomised trials suggested that non-invasive brain stimulation may reduce postoperative delirium, whereas the recent MODEST trial found no preventive benefit. We synthesised the randomised evidence for perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation. Methods: We searched eight bibliographic databases and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 30 September 2026 for randomised controlled trials of perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation in adults undergoing surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative delirium. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated risk ratios (RRs), mean differences, or standardised mean differences. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Results: Nine trials contributed data from 1451 participants. Postoperative delirium occurred in 72 of 750 participants receiving active stimulation and 166 of 701 controls (RR 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.56; I2=24.7%; moderate-certainty evidence). Estimates also favoured stimulation for hypoactive and hyperactive delirium, but not clearly for mixed delirium. Pain, anxiety, and sleep outcomes favoured stimulation but were highly heterogeneous and supported by very-low-certainty evidence. Length of hospital stay was not reduced. Adverse events could not be pooled because reporting was incomplete and inconsistent. Conclusions: Perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation may reduce postoperative delirium, but the evidence does not establish a class effect or support routine clinical use. Geographical concentration, methodological concerns, heterogeneous stimulation protocols, and discordance with the MODEST trial warrant independent multicentre sham-controlled trials. PROSPERO registration: CRD420261522168 Keywords: meta-analysis; non-invasive brain stimulation; perioperative neurocognitive disorders; postoperative delirium; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.02.26367005
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation for the prevention of postoperative delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Li Du, Jinjun Shu, Yanruo Huang, 张爱民 et al.
medRxiv
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
preprint

Perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation for the prevention of postoperative delirium: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Li Du, Jinjun Shu, Yanruo Huang, 张爱民, Xing Liu, Huaiming Wang, Deshan Li, Hongwei Zhang, Hui Pan, Jiang Zou
preprint en

Abstract

Background: Postoperative delirium is a common perioperative complication. Early randomised trials suggested that non-invasive brain stimulation may reduce postoperative delirium, whereas the recent MODEST trial found no preventive benefit. We synthesised the randomised evidence for perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation. Methods: We searched eight bibliographic databases and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to 30 September 2026 for randomised controlled trials of perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation in adults undergoing surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative delirium. Random-effects meta-analyses estimated risk ratios (RRs), mean differences, or standardised mean differences. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Results: Nine trials contributed data from 1451 participants. Postoperative delirium occurred in 72 of 750 participants receiving active stimulation and 166 of 701 controls (RR 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31-0.56; I2=24.7%; moderate-certainty evidence). Estimates also favoured stimulation for hypoactive and hyperactive delirium, but not clearly for mixed delirium. Pain, anxiety, and sleep outcomes favoured stimulation but were highly heterogeneous and supported by very-low-certainty evidence. Length of hospital stay was not reduced. Adverse events could not be pooled because reporting was incomplete and inconsistent. Conclusions: Perioperative non-invasive brain stimulation may reduce postoperative delirium, but the evidence does not establish a class effect or support routine clinical use. Geographical concentration, methodological concerns, heterogeneous stimulation protocols, and discordance with the MODEST trial warrant independent multicentre sham-controlled trials. PROSPERO registration: CRD420261522168 Keywords: meta-analysis; non-invasive brain stimulation; perioperative neurocognitive disorders; postoperative delirium; transcranial direct current stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation

medRxiv
Chengdu Medical College (CN), Sichuan Cancer Hospital (CN)
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon