Diagnostic and Treatment Availability of von Willebrand Disease Within Europe: Insights From a European Association for Hemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD) Survey

BACKGROUND: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, yet its diagnosis and management remain heterogeneous across Europe due to variable access to diagnosis and care. AIM: To characterize diagnostic and treatment practices for VWD across European hemophilia centers. METHODS: The European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD) VWD Working Group conducted a cross-sectional online survey among affiliated centers to evaluate center characteristics, use of bleeding assessment tools (BATs), availability of laboratory assays, genetic testing practices, diagnostic algorithms, and access to care and monitoring of treatments. RESULTS: Sixty-two centers (27 countries) participated, being mostly comprehensive hemophilia care centers (77%). BATs were used by 85% of centers. Variability of VWF levels (57%) and limited access to genetic testing (29%) were the most frequently reported diagnostic challenges. VWF:Ag and FVIII:C assays were widely available (98%), whereas multimer analysis (39%), VWF:FVIIIB (31%), and VWFpp testing (13%) were less accessible. Genetic testing was performed routinely or selectively by 89%, most commonly using targeted next-generation sequencing panels (65%). A VWF activity-to-antigen ratio threshold of 0.7 was used by 65% of centers to distinguish type 1 from type 2 VWD. While plasma-derived VWF/FVIII concentrates were universally available, access to recombinant VWF (rVWF) was limited, with approximately one-third of centers reporting no access. Prophylaxis was used predominantly for type 3 (78%) and cases with severe bleeding phenotypes regardless of subtype (63%). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in VWD diagnosis and care persist across Europe, highlighting the need for harmonized pathways and equitable access to specialized testing and therapies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Haemophilia
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70433
Primary Topic
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic and Treatment Availability of von Willebrand Disease Within Europe: Insights From a European Association for Hemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD) Survey

Ana Boban, Giancarlo Castaman, Omid Seidizadeh, James S. O’Donnell et al.
Haemophilia
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
article

Diagnostic and Treatment Availability of von Willebrand Disease Within Europe: Insights From a European Association for Hemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD) Survey

Ana Boban, Giancarlo Castaman, Omid Seidizadeh, James S. O’Donnell, Jeroen C.J. Eikenboom, Hamideh Yadegari, Riitta Lassila, Sophie Susen, L. Lorenzo, Susie Shapiro, EAHAD von Willebrand Disease Working Group
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) is the most common inherited bleeding disorder, yet its diagnosis and management remain heterogeneous across Europe due to variable access to diagnosis and care. AIM: To characterize diagnostic and treatment practices for VWD across European hemophilia centers. METHODS: The European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD) VWD Working Group conducted a cross-sectional online survey among affiliated centers to evaluate center characteristics, use of bleeding assessment tools (BATs), availability of laboratory assays, genetic testing practices, diagnostic algorithms, and access to care and monitoring of treatments. RESULTS: Sixty-two centers (27 countries) participated, being mostly comprehensive hemophilia care centers (77%). BATs were used by 85% of centers. Variability of VWF levels (57%) and limited access to genetic testing (29%) were the most frequently reported diagnostic challenges. VWF:Ag and FVIII:C assays were widely available (98%), whereas multimer analysis (39%), VWF:FVIIIB (31%), and VWFpp testing (13%) were less accessible. Genetic testing was performed routinely or selectively by 89%, most commonly using targeted next-generation sequencing panels (65%). A VWF activity-to-antigen ratio threshold of 0.7 was used by 65% of centers to distinguish type 1 from type 2 VWD. While plasma-derived VWF/FVIII concentrates were universally available, access to recombinant VWF (rVWF) was limited, with approximately one-third of centers reporting no access. Prophylaxis was used predominantly for type 3 (78%) and cases with severe bleeding phenotypes regardless of subtype (63%). CONCLUSIONS: Disparities in VWD diagnosis and care persist across Europe, highlighting the need for harmonized pathways and equitable access to specialized testing and therapies.

Haemophilia
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Bonn (DE), University Hospital Centre Zagreb (HR), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Inserm (FR), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Institut Pasteur de Lille (FR), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), University of Oxford (GB), Institute for Transfusion Medicine (US), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Hemophilia Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon