Harness Learning: Agent Harnesses Are Learnable Policy Components

Agent performance depends on its harness, the execution system surrounding the model that organizes context, tools, memory, and control flow. Recent methods aim to improve subsequent execution through program search, configuration adaptation, editor training, or accumulated experience, but differ in modified components, update mechanisms, and reuse evaluation. We argue that harnesses are learnable policy components and formulate Harness Learning as a common learning problem with three complementary dimensions: Representation specifies executable components and available modifications; Optimization uses experience to improve harnesses or their construction mechanisms; Generalization evaluates resulting systems on new tasks. A shared execution policy and task score connect these dimensions. The framework analyzes existing systems and motivates research on harness composition, transfer, continual improvement, and model–harness co-learning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202611.0303.v1
Primary Topic
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Harness Learning: Agent Harnesses Are Learnable Policy Components

Jitao Sang, J. Zhang, Xinyan Wen
Preprints.org
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
preprint

Harness Learning: Agent Harnesses Are Learnable Policy Components

Jitao Sang, J. Zhang, Xinyan Wen
preprint en

Abstract

Agent performance depends on its harness, the execution system surrounding the model that organizes context, tools, memory, and control flow. Recent methods aim to improve subsequent execution through program search, configuration adaptation, editor training, or accumulated experience, but differ in modified components, update mechanisms, and reuse evaluation. We argue that harnesses are learnable policy components and formulate Harness Learning as a common learning problem with three complementary dimensions: Representation specifies executable components and available modifications; Optimization uses experience to improve harnesses or their construction mechanisms; Generalization evaluates resulting systems on new tasks. A shared execution policy and task score connect these dimensions. The framework analyzes existing systems and motivates research on harness composition, transfer, continual improvement, and model–harness co-learning.

Preprints.org
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon