Enabling Cyber-Resilient Smart Grid Communication Using 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Analysis of LTE vs. 5G

Communication networks are a crucial part of modern-day smart power grids. Delays in the communication network, caused by traffic congestion or cyberattacks, can affect effective grid operation. The research in this paper analyses how different smart grid communication frameworks (LTE and 5G) behave under similar traffic conditions. This study considers three major factors of evaluation: latency evaluation for 5G and LTE under traffic congestion, the advantages of network slicing in 5G, and smart grid cyber-resilience metrics for 5G and LTE. The traffic classification is established based on the IEEE Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy Technology and IT Operation, IEEE Standard 2030-2011. Based on this standard, the PMU traffic is allocated to the URLLC slice, the user traffic is allocated to the eMBB slice, and the distributed energy resources and energy storage traffic are allocated to the mMTC slice. The experimental design of both 5G and LTE smart grid communication architectures is realised through the co-simulation of MATLAB/Simulink (version R2026a) and Comnetsemu (version 1.0.0). The results of this study show that network slicing enables PMU traffic isolation under conditions of heavy traffic; therefore, the PMU traffic remains protected under congestion because of the slice-based resource allocation in 5G. In this study, 5G therefore provides better performance compared to the conventional LTE-based WAN architectures. The experimental results indicate that 5G provides better latency as compared to LTE in smart grid communication architecture. The average latency values for the 5G architecture range from 34 to 37 ms, whereas those of the LTE architecture are 46 to 47 ms. Both 5G and LTE architectures are also evaluated for cyber resilience under conditions of DoS attack. The 5G architecture recovers within an average of 9 s compared to LTE, which takes an average of 16 s. Our prior research has identified the advantages of network slicing in PMU traffic isolation in smart grid communication. The scope of this study indicates that the advantages of network slicing make 5G a comparatively better communication architecture in smart grid communication than LTE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19215211
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enabling Cyber-Resilient Smart Grid Communication Using 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Analysis of LTE vs. 5G

Manjula G. Nair, G. Amritha, Fabrizio Granelli
Energies
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
article

Enabling Cyber-Resilient Smart Grid Communication Using 5G Network Slicing: A Comparative Analysis of LTE vs. 5G

Manjula G. Nair, G. Amritha, Fabrizio Granelli
article en

Abstract

Communication networks are a crucial part of modern-day smart power grids. Delays in the communication network, caused by traffic congestion or cyberattacks, can affect effective grid operation. The research in this paper analyses how different smart grid communication frameworks (LTE and 5G) behave under similar traffic conditions. This study considers three major factors of evaluation: latency evaluation for 5G and LTE under traffic congestion, the advantages of network slicing in 5G, and smart grid cyber-resilience metrics for 5G and LTE. The traffic classification is established based on the IEEE Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy Technology and IT Operation, IEEE Standard 2030-2011. Based on this standard, the PMU traffic is allocated to the URLLC slice, the user traffic is allocated to the eMBB slice, and the distributed energy resources and energy storage traffic are allocated to the mMTC slice. The experimental design of both 5G and LTE smart grid communication architectures is realised through the co-simulation of MATLAB/Simulink (version R2026a) and Comnetsemu (version 1.0.0). The results of this study show that network slicing enables PMU traffic isolation under conditions of heavy traffic; therefore, the PMU traffic remains protected under congestion because of the slice-based resource allocation in 5G. In this study, 5G therefore provides better performance compared to the conventional LTE-based WAN architectures. The experimental results indicate that 5G provides better latency as compared to LTE in smart grid communication architecture. The average latency values for the 5G architecture range from 34 to 37 ms, whereas those of the LTE architecture are 46 to 47 ms. Both 5G and LTE architectures are also evaluated for cyber resilience under conditions of DoS attack. The 5G architecture recovers within an average of 9 s compared to LTE, which takes an average of 16 s. Our prior research has identified the advantages of network slicing in PMU traffic isolation in smart grid communication. The scope of this study indicates that the advantages of network slicing make 5G a comparatively better communication architecture in smart grid communication than LTE.

EnergiesVol. 19(21)
University of Trento (IT), Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Smart Grid Security and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon