Comparative analysis of real-time appearance-based mapping and cartographer algorithms using deep learning object detection

Abstract Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) shares computation, memory, sensing, and middleware resources with other robotic perception tasks. This study evaluates Cartographer and RTAB-Map in ROS 2 Humble/Gazebo using a TurtleBot3 Waffle Pi, both alone and while a separate YOLOv8n object-detection node runs concurrently on the CPU. Ten runs were analyzed per configuration (40 runs total). Independent Gazebo ground truth and TF-derived SLAM trajectories were converted to planar x-y-yaw TUM trajectories, associated within 20 ms, and evaluated using translation and yaw absolute pose error (APE) and 1 m relative pose error (RPE). Baseline translation APE RMSE was 0.030965 ± 0.007947 m for Cartographer and 0.014013 ± 0.003691 m for RTAB-Map; corresponding translation RPE RMSE was 0.017614 ± 0.002281 m and 0.006209 ± 0.001787 m. With concurrent YOLOv8n, translation APE RMSE was 0.031711 ± 0.007119 m and 0.017177 ± 0.007964 m, respectively. Combined monitored process CPU reached 670.491 ± 15.741% and 624.513 ± 12.703%, while Gazebo real-time factor remained near 1.0. Because the groups were independently teleoperated, baseline-to-YOLO differences are interpreted descriptively rather than causally. The workflow integrates repeated-run localization accuracy, orientation error, resource profiling, and motion characterization under documented simulation conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-74364-z
Primary Topic
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of real-time appearance-based mapping and cartographer algorithms using deep learning object detection

Mohamed T. Eraky, Bahaa Nasser, Abdullah Mohamed Elbanna, M Sabry Saraya
Scientific Reports
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
article

Comparative analysis of real-time appearance-based mapping and cartographer algorithms using deep learning object detection

Mohamed T. Eraky, Bahaa Nasser, Abdullah Mohamed Elbanna, M Sabry Saraya
article en

Abstract

Abstract Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) shares computation, memory, sensing, and middleware resources with other robotic perception tasks. This study evaluates Cartographer and RTAB-Map in ROS 2 Humble/Gazebo using a TurtleBot3 Waffle Pi, both alone and while a separate YOLOv8n object-detection node runs concurrently on the CPU. Ten runs were analyzed per configuration (40 runs total). Independent Gazebo ground truth and TF-derived SLAM trajectories were converted to planar x-y-yaw TUM trajectories, associated within 20 ms, and evaluated using translation and yaw absolute pose error (APE) and 1 m relative pose error (RPE). Baseline translation APE RMSE was 0.030965 ± 0.007947 m for Cartographer and 0.014013 ± 0.003691 m for RTAB-Map; corresponding translation RPE RMSE was 0.017614 ± 0.002281 m and 0.006209 ± 0.001787 m. With concurrent YOLOv8n, translation APE RMSE was 0.031711 ± 0.007119 m and 0.017177 ± 0.007964 m, respectively. Combined monitored process CPU reached 670.491 ± 15.741% and 624.513 ± 12.703%, while Gazebo real-time factor remained near 1.0. Because the groups were independently teleoperated, baseline-to-YOLO differences are interpreted descriptively rather than causally. The workflow integrates repeated-run localization accuracy, orientation error, resource profiling, and motion characterization under documented simulation conditions.

Scientific Reports
Misr University for Science and Technology (EG), Mansoura University (EG), Mansoura National University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Comparative analysis of real-time appearance-based mapping and cartographer algorithms using deep learning object detection — Mohamed T. Eraky, Bahaa Nasser, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS