Unconfoundedness as an Information Constraint

This paper provides an information-theoretic characterization of unconfoundedness within a general class of models allowing for endogenous selection. We impose a conditional mutual information (CMI) restriction requiring that the information about treatment contained in a potential outcome, conditional on covariates, does not exceed that contained in its latent heterogeneity. Under the maintained model conditions, this restriction is equivalent to a multiplicative factorization of treatment probabilities into separate functions of latent heterogeneity and covariates. Although the CMI restriction permits endogenous selection, sufficiently rich variation in treatment probabilities across covariate values makes it equivalent to unconfoundedness for the corresponding potential outcome. For binary treatments, any nonconstant propensity score suffices; for multiple treatments, a full-rank condition on the second-moment matrix of the propensity-score vector is sufficient. State-specific restrictions bound residual selection and imply exogeneity for individual treatment states under boundary-support conditions. Extensions cover continuous treatments and instrument exogeneity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2611.03550
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Unconfoundedness as an Information Constraint

Christoph Breunig
arXiv (Cornell University)
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
preprint

Unconfoundedness as an Information Constraint

Christoph Breunig
preprint en

Abstract

This paper provides an information-theoretic characterization of unconfoundedness within a general class of models allowing for endogenous selection. We impose a conditional mutual information (CMI) restriction requiring that the information about treatment contained in a potential outcome, conditional on covariates, does not exceed that contained in its latent heterogeneity. Under the maintained model conditions, this restriction is equivalent to a multiplicative factorization of treatment probabilities into separate functions of latent heterogeneity and covariates. Although the CMI restriction permits endogenous selection, sufficiently rich variation in treatment probabilities across covariate values makes it equivalent to unconfoundedness for the corresponding potential outcome. For binary treatments, any nonconstant propensity score suffices; for multiple treatments, a full-rank condition on the second-moment matrix of the propensity-score vector is sufficient. State-specific restrictions bound residual selection and imply exogeneity for individual treatment states under boundary-support conditions. Extensions cover continuous treatments and instrument exogeneity.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon