You Are Not Deleuze! Research ing Through Becom ing

The present inquiry emerges from the author’s journey of writing a PhD dissertation at the intersection of posthumanism and translation studies. It engages with the uncertainties, tensions and ambiguities encountered when attempting to do research otherwise, trying to push the AcademicUniversityMachine forward. It strives to conjugate methodology as a verb and encourage a diffractive (non)methodology/ methodology beyond anthropocentric and humanist regimes of thought. The paper’s architecture resists conventional linear scaffolding, and the reader is encouraged to navigate how postfoundational approaches like posthumanism invite us to research otherwise, pushing the boundaries of translation studies towards a more pluralistic horizon. This is the story of a researcher caught in the paradox of satisfying institutional imperatives while simultaneously unlearning the very structures that stifle creative emergence. It is not a recipe on how to do postqualitative, diffractive inquiry in translation but an invitation to imagine doing research differently.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Culture Studies &#x2194 Critical Methodologies
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15327086261498864
Primary Topic
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

You Are Not Deleuze! Research ing Through Becom ing

Shabnam Naderi
Culture Studies &#x2194 Critical Methodologies
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
article

You Are Not Deleuze! Research ing Through Becom ing

Shabnam Naderi
article en

Abstract

The present inquiry emerges from the author’s journey of writing a PhD dissertation at the intersection of posthumanism and translation studies. It engages with the uncertainties, tensions and ambiguities encountered when attempting to do research otherwise, trying to push the AcademicUniversityMachine forward. It strives to conjugate methodology as a verb and encourage a diffractive (non)methodology/ methodology beyond anthropocentric and humanist regimes of thought. The paper’s architecture resists conventional linear scaffolding, and the reader is encouraged to navigate how postfoundational approaches like posthumanism invite us to research otherwise, pushing the boundaries of translation studies towards a more pluralistic horizon. This is the story of a researcher caught in the paradox of satisfying institutional imperatives while simultaneously unlearning the very structures that stifle creative emergence. It is not a recipe on how to do postqualitative, diffractive inquiry in translation but an invitation to imagine doing research differently.

Culture Studies &#x2194 Critical Methodologies
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
You Are Not Deleuze! Research ing Through Becom ing — Shabnam Naderi · Culture Studies &#x2194 Critical Methodologies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS