A translational bioethical & implementation framework for the use of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine

Artificial intelligence (AI) in cardiology is rapidly expanding, but enthusiasm for anticipated benefits should be balanced by a more critical inspection of ethical concerns. In this state-of-the-art review, we discuss the four pillars of bioethics and their overlap with AI regulatory requirements to identify the potential gain and challenges, for both cardiologists and cardiac patients alike, in integrating AI-based clinical tools within various aspects and settings of care. By investigating the current gaps in regulatory oversight and illustrating hypothetical case scenarios, we aim to locate points of weakness along the course of implementation, from algorithm design to tool misuse, which endanger autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice if AI production proceeds without further attention into safeguard development. Finally, we propose governance principles and priorities for AI in cardiovascular medicine to highlight areas where a bioethical-regulatory framework needs to be adapted in order to ensure responsible use of AI in patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Cardiovascular Health
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44325-026-00159-w
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A translational bioethical & implementation framework for the use of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine

Sanjeev P. Bhavnani, Sam Whitman McGrath, Camryn J. Kimura, Keshav R. Nayak et al.
npj Cardiovascular Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

A translational bioethical & implementation framework for the use of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine

Sanjeev P. Bhavnani, Sam Whitman McGrath, Camryn J. Kimura, Keshav R. Nayak, Leeda Rashid
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) in cardiology is rapidly expanding, but enthusiasm for anticipated benefits should be balanced by a more critical inspection of ethical concerns. In this state-of-the-art review, we discuss the four pillars of bioethics and their overlap with AI regulatory requirements to identify the potential gain and challenges, for both cardiologists and cardiac patients alike, in integrating AI-based clinical tools within various aspects and settings of care. By investigating the current gaps in regulatory oversight and illustrating hypothetical case scenarios, we aim to locate points of weakness along the course of implementation, from algorithm design to tool misuse, which endanger autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice if AI production proceeds without further attention into safeguard development. Finally, we propose governance principles and priorities for AI in cardiovascular medicine to highlight areas where a bioethical-regulatory framework needs to be adapted in order to ensure responsible use of AI in patient care.

npj Cardiovascular Health
Fordham University (US), Brown University (US), Scripps Mercy Hospital (US), Scripps Clinic Medical Group (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
A translational bioethical & implementation framework for the use of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular medicine — Sanjeev P. Bhavnani, Sam Whitman McGrath, et al. · npj Cardiovascular Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS