True Enough Renderings? The Ethics of CGI Visualizations in Urban Design through Nelson Goodman and Catherine Elgin’s Lens

CGI visualizations are central to decision-making in the built environment but are often criticized for their potential to mislead, especially when the projected outcomes do not align with the final built reality. Unlike most CGI applications in entertainment, which rely on similar visual techniques but lack epistemic stakes and truth value, visualizations in urban and environmental planning raise significant ethical concerns. These concerns are particularly acute as they influence public perception and trust. As CGI visualizations advance in aesthetic realism, technological developments, and their capacity to shape public decision-making, addressing these issues becomes increasingly urgent. Drawing on the philosophical work of Nelson Goodman and Catherine Elgin, this paper examines how their concepts of projections, relevant conditions, and "true enough" models illuminate the complexities and ethical concerns surrounding CGI visualizations. By applying these frameworks to visualizations of public projects, the study explores the epistemic and ethical challenges inherent in projecting future environments through digital media.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human-Technology Relations
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59490/jhtr.2026.4.8015
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

True Enough Renderings? The Ethics of CGI Visualizations in Urban Design through Nelson Goodman and Catherine Elgin’s Lens

Patrick Collins, Attracta Brennan, Hermano Luz Rodrigues
Journal of Human-Technology Relations
Urban Planning and Governance
article

True Enough Renderings? The Ethics of CGI Visualizations in Urban Design through Nelson Goodman and Catherine Elgin’s Lens

Patrick Collins, Attracta Brennan, Hermano Luz Rodrigues
article en

Abstract

CGI visualizations are central to decision-making in the built environment but are often criticized for their potential to mislead, especially when the projected outcomes do not align with the final built reality. Unlike most CGI applications in entertainment, which rely on similar visual techniques but lack epistemic stakes and truth value, visualizations in urban and environmental planning raise significant ethical concerns. These concerns are particularly acute as they influence public perception and trust. As CGI visualizations advance in aesthetic realism, technological developments, and their capacity to shape public decision-making, addressing these issues becomes increasingly urgent. Drawing on the philosophical work of Nelson Goodman and Catherine Elgin, this paper examines how their concepts of projections, relevant conditions, and "true enough" models illuminate the complexities and ethical concerns surrounding CGI visualizations. By applying these frameworks to visualizations of public projects, the study explores the epistemic and ethical challenges inherent in projecting future environments through digital media.

Journal of Human-Technology RelationsVol. 4
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
True Enough Renderings? The Ethics of CGI Visualizations in Urban Design through Nelson Goodman and Catherine Elgin’s Lens — Patrick Collins, Attracta Brennan, et al. · Journal of Human-Technology Relations (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS