Machine Learning for Early Transformer Insulation Defect Risk Ranking

Early identification of transformer insulation defects during IEC 60270 induced-voltage acceptance testing could enable high-risk units to be prioritized before the guaranteed test voltage is reached. This study investigated whether early-ramp partial discharge characteristics could predict the partial discharge inception voltage (PDIV) and support defect-risk ranking. An HPWOA-optimized dual-output feedforward neural network (HPWOA-DO-FNN) was developed and compared with Linear Regression, Random Forest (RF) Regressor, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) Regressor, Logistic Regression Classifier, and RF Classifier. Ten features were extracted from 120 s sliding windows applied to the first 50% of IEC 60270 test records. The dataset comprised 1705 windows from 39 source files representing 18 power transformers tested in South Africa between 2019 and 2021. Five-fold file-level GroupKFold cross-validation prevented leakage between windows from the same test file. Uncertainty was estimated using 1000-replicate group-level bootstrap confidence intervals. Performance was evaluated using R2, RMSE, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1 score, and top-quartile risk capture. All models demonstrated near-zero or negative coefficients of determination (R2) for absolute PDIV prediction (best result: GBM-Regressor PDIVRatio R2 = 0.097, 95% bootstrap CI [−0.237, 0.354]), confirming that PDIV cannot be reconstructed from 10 early-ramp features alone—an expected result given that PDIV is a transformer-level property, while windows sample correlated sub-sequences of a single test session. Despite this, relative defect-risk ranking remains achievable: the ranking task does not require accurate point prediction. GBM-Regressor achieved the highest PDIVRatio R2 (0.097) and lowest RMSE (0.323), although its confidence interval included zero. For defect discrimination, RF Classifier achieved an AUC of 0.714 (95% CI, 0.628–0.803) and the highest top-quartile capture (43.5%), while GBM-Regressor achieved an AUC of 0.712 (95% CI, 0.624–0.801) and an F1 score of 0.603. HPWOA achieved an AUC of 0.527 (95% CI, 0.389–0.662). Early-ramp features are insufficient for accurate transformer-level PDIV prediction but provide useful relative defect-risk ranking. GBM-Regressor and RF Classifier demonstrated the strongest discrimination and represent the most promising approaches for early-risk triage in this small tabular dataset.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19215233
Primary Topic
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning for Early Transformer Insulation Defect Risk Ranking

Bonginkosi Allen Thango, Lucas Thobejane
Energies
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
article

Machine Learning for Early Transformer Insulation Defect Risk Ranking

Bonginkosi Allen Thango, Lucas Thobejane
article en

Abstract

Early identification of transformer insulation defects during IEC 60270 induced-voltage acceptance testing could enable high-risk units to be prioritized before the guaranteed test voltage is reached. This study investigated whether early-ramp partial discharge characteristics could predict the partial discharge inception voltage (PDIV) and support defect-risk ranking. An HPWOA-optimized dual-output feedforward neural network (HPWOA-DO-FNN) was developed and compared with Linear Regression, Random Forest (RF) Regressor, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) Regressor, Logistic Regression Classifier, and RF Classifier. Ten features were extracted from 120 s sliding windows applied to the first 50% of IEC 60270 test records. The dataset comprised 1705 windows from 39 source files representing 18 power transformers tested in South Africa between 2019 and 2021. Five-fold file-level GroupKFold cross-validation prevented leakage between windows from the same test file. Uncertainty was estimated using 1000-replicate group-level bootstrap confidence intervals. Performance was evaluated using R2, RMSE, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1 score, and top-quartile risk capture. All models demonstrated near-zero or negative coefficients of determination (R2) for absolute PDIV prediction (best result: GBM-Regressor PDIVRatio R2 = 0.097, 95% bootstrap CI [−0.237, 0.354]), confirming that PDIV cannot be reconstructed from 10 early-ramp features alone—an expected result given that PDIV is a transformer-level property, while windows sample correlated sub-sequences of a single test session. Despite this, relative defect-risk ranking remains achievable: the ranking task does not require accurate point prediction. GBM-Regressor achieved the highest PDIVRatio R2 (0.097) and lowest RMSE (0.323), although its confidence interval included zero. For defect discrimination, RF Classifier achieved an AUC of 0.714 (95% CI, 0.628–0.803) and the highest top-quartile capture (43.5%), while GBM-Regressor achieved an AUC of 0.712 (95% CI, 0.624–0.801) and an F1 score of 0.603. HPWOA achieved an AUC of 0.527 (95% CI, 0.389–0.662). Early-ramp features are insufficient for accurate transformer-level PDIV prediction but provide useful relative defect-risk ranking. GBM-Regressor and RF Classifier demonstrated the strongest discrimination and represent the most promising approaches for early-risk triage in this small tabular dataset.

EnergiesVol. 19(21)
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Power Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon