Profits over Principles: Animal Welfare Takes a Back Seat During Transport to Slaughter in Canada’s Animal Agriculture Industry

Although Canada has established laws to protect farmed animals during transport to slaughter, enforcement gaps and insufficient protections persist, resulting in preventable suffering. This article argues that Canada’s framework systematically underprotects animals during transport: property-based legal concepts, deference to industry-defined “generally accepted practices”, and fragmented federal-provincial enforcement built around nonbinding NFACC standards undermine accountability. Drawing together deficiencies that are individually well documented, it argues that they share a common mechanism and adds new evidence of that mechanism from Canada’s live horse-export trade. Through critical analysis of the Health of Animals Act, the Criminal Code, NFACC Codes of Practice, relevant case law, and comparative material from the European Union, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, the article considers why technically sound reform proposals have repeatedly failed to be adopted. It recommends adopting enforceable species-specific transport standards, strengthening federal oversight, and improving reporting and transparency.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
LEOH - Journal of Animal Law Ethics and One Health
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58590/leoh.2026.016
Primary Topic
Animal Law and Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Profits over Principles: Animal Welfare Takes a Back Seat During Transport to Slaughter in Canada’s Animal Agriculture Industry

Mark Snyder
LEOH - Journal of Animal Law Ethics and One Health
Animal Law and Welfare
article

Profits over Principles: Animal Welfare Takes a Back Seat During Transport to Slaughter in Canada’s Animal Agriculture Industry

Mark Snyder
article en

Abstract

Although Canada has established laws to protect farmed animals during transport to slaughter, enforcement gaps and insufficient protections persist, resulting in preventable suffering. This article argues that Canada’s framework systematically underprotects animals during transport: property-based legal concepts, deference to industry-defined “generally accepted practices”, and fragmented federal-provincial enforcement built around nonbinding NFACC standards undermine accountability. Drawing together deficiencies that are individually well documented, it argues that they share a common mechanism and adds new evidence of that mechanism from Canada’s live horse-export trade. Through critical analysis of the Health of Animals Act, the Criminal Code, NFACC Codes of Practice, relevant case law, and comparative material from the European Union, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States, the article considers why technically sound reform proposals have repeatedly failed to be adopted. It recommends adopting enforceable species-specific transport standards, strengthening federal oversight, and improving reporting and transparency.

LEOH - Journal of Animal Law Ethics and One Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Animal Law and Welfare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon