Regional governance and Interreg cooperation – the case of the European Alps

Against the backdrop of the closing Interreg VI period, this paper examines the implementation patterns of the European Territorial Cooperation in the Alpine region. Using near-complete Interreg V (2014–2020) data, we analyze thematic foci, budgets, and spatial dimension across Interreg A programs and the Interreg B Alpine Space Programme. Our findings reveal a “soft” thematic orientation: Interreg A prioritizes projects in tourism, culture, and health and social services, while Interreg B targets more structural fields such as spatial planning and transport and mobility. Three drivers explain these patterns: (a) the spatial structure of the involved territories (e.g., urban corridors, tourism flows, and freight axes), (b) path dependencies and institutionalization, and (c) territorial diversity requiring place-based strategies. Furthermore, cooperation hotspots are concentrated in highly urbanized border regions (e.g., Geneva, Basel, Brenner, Lake Constance). Policy implications for 2028+ include safeguarding continuity, strengthening regional assets, and orienting cooperation towards resilience and strategic objectives while retaining the benefits of soft instruments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geographica Helvetica
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-81-679-2026
Primary Topic
Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regional governance and Interreg cooperation – the case of the European Alps

Markus Lambracht, Tobias Chilla
Geographica Helvetica
Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
article

Regional governance and Interreg cooperation – the case of the European Alps

Markus Lambracht, Tobias Chilla
article en

Abstract

Against the backdrop of the closing Interreg VI period, this paper examines the implementation patterns of the European Territorial Cooperation in the Alpine region. Using near-complete Interreg V (2014–2020) data, we analyze thematic foci, budgets, and spatial dimension across Interreg A programs and the Interreg B Alpine Space Programme. Our findings reveal a “soft” thematic orientation: Interreg A prioritizes projects in tourism, culture, and health and social services, while Interreg B targets more structural fields such as spatial planning and transport and mobility. Three drivers explain these patterns: (a) the spatial structure of the involved territories (e.g., urban corridors, tourism flows, and freight axes), (b) path dependencies and institutionalization, and (c) territorial diversity requiring place-based strategies. Furthermore, cooperation hotspots are concentrated in highly urbanized border regions (e.g., Geneva, Basel, Brenner, Lake Constance). Policy implications for 2028+ include safeguarding continuity, strengthening regional assets, and orienting cooperation towards resilience and strategic objectives while retaining the benefits of soft instruments.

Geographica HelveticaVol. 81(4)
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cross-Border Cooperation and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Regional governance and Interreg cooperation – the case of the European Alps — Markus Lambracht, Tobias Chilla · Geographica Helvetica (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS