The Axiomatic Theory of Economic Sovereignty, Architectural Authority and Human-Centric Governance in the Representation Economy

ANOA — Essay VII The Axiomatic Theory of Economic Sovereignty, Architectural Authority and Human-Centric Governance in the Representation Economy Abstract This paper develops an axiomatic, mathematical, and institutional framework for economic sovereignty, architectural authority, and human-centric governance in AI-native economies. Building upon the ANOA research programme, the Representation Economy, and the Inferential Web, the study examines the structural limitations of conventional economic indicators, monetary transmission mechanisms, and institutional governance models under increasingly autonomous computational coordination. The paper distinguishes economic output, represented value, financial solvency, real-resource availability, and realized human welfare. It introduces a multidimensional welfare-accounting framework designed to evaluate human capabilities, material security, autonomy, distribution, accessibility, and systemic resilience beyond conventional GDP-centered assessments. A formal treatment of monetary and protocol-based economic transmission identifies conditions under which traditional monetary instruments may become insufficient to achieve specified economic objectives. The analysis further examines agentic systemic risk, institutional concentration, and the allocation of decision-making authority across public, private, sectoral, and federated protocol architectures. Particular attention is given to the Protocol Architect's responsibilities, including the separation of technical design authority, intellectual-property rights, economic-policy competence, monetary authority, and constitutional accountability. The research develops formal propositions, conditional proofs, counterexamples, and proposed constitutional principles. Its results establish theoretical conditions and research hypotheses rather than empirical proof of universal institutional obsolescence. The central proposition is that AI-native economic governance should be evaluated not only through production and monetary aggregates, but through the effective realization of human welfare, legitimate authority, institutional resilience, and accountable computational coordination. Keywords: ANOA; AI-Native Organizational Architecture; Representation Economy; Economic Sovereignty; Protocol Architecture; Human Welfare Accounting; Agentic Monetary Transmission; Institutional Obsolescence; Inferential Web; Constitutional Governance; Computational Economics; Distributed Accountability.