Event-Time Accounting for Two-Leg Perpetual Positions: Quantity Closure, Asynchronous Settlement and Evidence Levels

Two-leg perpetual positions are often evaluated by matching quote-currency notionals and extrapolating a displayed funding-rate spread. That practice can leave residual quantity, omit eligible funding events, double-count execution costs, and turn unavailable evidence into zero. This methods note develops an event-time ledger for linear, same-settlement-currency perpetual pairs. It combines common-base-quantity closure, four depth-walked fills, per-event funding eligibility, a closed-position identity, a basis-minus-crossing decomposition, scenario-consistent error attribution, and explicit evidence labels. Deterministic examples show that symmetric enumeration produces 7.20 USDT rather than 0.20 USDT in an eight-hour toy window and that a direction-fixed “oracle” need not be an upper bound. A bounded illustration using three routes and two mutually exclusive arms on one day yields net-before-funding paper results from −24.93 to −89.91 USDT. These are not independent trades or portfolio returns. Official settlement marks, account fee evidence, and real orders are absent; exact account net remains unavailable. The framework separates accounting validity from statistical or economic validation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23932841
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Event-Time Accounting for Two-Leg Perpetual Positions: Quantity Closure, Asynchronous Settlement and Evidence Levels

Hang Liu
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
preprint

Event-Time Accounting for Two-Leg Perpetual Positions: Quantity Closure, Asynchronous Settlement and Evidence Levels

Hang Liu
preprint en

Abstract

Two-leg perpetual positions are often evaluated by matching quote-currency notionals and extrapolating a displayed funding-rate spread. That practice can leave residual quantity, omit eligible funding events, double-count execution costs, and turn unavailable evidence into zero. This methods note develops an event-time ledger for linear, same-settlement-currency perpetual pairs. It combines common-base-quantity closure, four depth-walked fills, per-event funding eligibility, a closed-position identity, a basis-minus-crossing decomposition, scenario-consistent error attribution, and explicit evidence labels. Deterministic examples show that symmetric enumeration produces 7.20 USDT rather than 0.20 USDT in an eight-hour toy window and that a direction-fixed “oracle” need not be an upper bound. A bounded illustration using three routes and two mutually exclusive arms on one day yields net-before-funding paper results from −24.93 to −89.91 USDT. These are not independent trades or portfolio returns. Official settlement marks, account fee evidence, and real orders are absent; exact account net remains unavailable. The framework separates accounting validity from statistical or economic validation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon