Efficiency Gain and Early Toxicity Profile of Ultra—Versus Moderate-Hypofractionation: A Matched Real-World Comparison of the Two Current Standard Schedules for Adjuvant Breast Radiotherapy

Background: Ultra-hypofractionation (UHF) and moderate-hypofractionation (MHF) represent standard adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) schedules in breast cancer (BC). This study evaluates the departmental workflow impact and early physician-assessed toxicity kinetics of UHF compared to MHF in a matched real-world cohort. Methods: Patients receiving UHF (26 Gy in 5 fractions ± simultaneous boost) during the first year of institutional adoption were matched 1:1 with historical MHF patients (40.05 Gy in 15 fractions ± sequential boost). Departmental workflow metrics and treatment delays were evaluated. Physician-graded acute toxicities (CTCAE v5.0) were recorded at treatment completion (Day 0), Day 10, and Day 50 post-RT. Results: In total, 240 patients were analyzed. Transitioning to UHF coincided with enhanced efficiency, increasing adjuvant breast RT patient volume by 167% and reducing treatment delays (11% vs. 66%). UHF demonstrated lower G2 erythema at Day 0 (2% vs. 14%) and Day 10 (13% vs. 25%). Conversely, UHF exhibited higher G2 mastodynia (9% vs. 2%), oedema (10% vs. 3%) and G1 nipple–areola hyperpigmentation (NAC) (45% vs. 5%) at Day 10. Most acute toxicities were transient, becoming comparable between cohorts by Day 50. Conclusions: Implementing UHF coincided with efficiency gain without compromising overall acute safety. However, findings necessitate prospective translational validation. Personalization of radiotherapy in breast cancer remains a cornerstone of modern cancer care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation6040043
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficiency Gain and Early Toxicity Profile of Ultra—Versus Moderate-Hypofractionation: A Matched Real-World Comparison of the Two Current Standard Schedules for Adjuvant Breast Radiotherapy

Mara Caroprese, Angela Barillaro, Mauro Buono, Manuel Conson et al.
Radiation
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Efficiency Gain and Early Toxicity Profile of Ultra—Versus Moderate-Hypofractionation: A Matched Real-World Comparison of the Two Current Standard Schedules for Adjuvant Breast Radiotherapy

Mara Caroprese, Angela Barillaro, Mauro Buono, Manuel Conson, Emanuele Chioccola, Stefania Clemente, Christina Amanda Goodyear, Roberto Pacelli, Antonio Farella, Caterina Oliviero, Gianluca Valerio, Giuseppe Salzano
article en

Abstract

Background: Ultra-hypofractionation (UHF) and moderate-hypofractionation (MHF) represent standard adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) schedules in breast cancer (BC). This study evaluates the departmental workflow impact and early physician-assessed toxicity kinetics of UHF compared to MHF in a matched real-world cohort. Methods: Patients receiving UHF (26 Gy in 5 fractions ± simultaneous boost) during the first year of institutional adoption were matched 1:1 with historical MHF patients (40.05 Gy in 15 fractions ± sequential boost). Departmental workflow metrics and treatment delays were evaluated. Physician-graded acute toxicities (CTCAE v5.0) were recorded at treatment completion (Day 0), Day 10, and Day 50 post-RT. Results: In total, 240 patients were analyzed. Transitioning to UHF coincided with enhanced efficiency, increasing adjuvant breast RT patient volume by 167% and reducing treatment delays (11% vs. 66%). UHF demonstrated lower G2 erythema at Day 0 (2% vs. 14%) and Day 10 (13% vs. 25%). Conversely, UHF exhibited higher G2 mastodynia (9% vs. 2%), oedema (10% vs. 3%) and G1 nipple–areola hyperpigmentation (NAC) (45% vs. 5%) at Day 10. Most acute toxicities were transient, becoming comparable between cohorts by Day 50. Conclusions: Implementing UHF coincided with efficiency gain without compromising overall acute safety. However, findings necessitate prospective translational validation. Personalization of radiotherapy in breast cancer remains a cornerstone of modern cancer care.

RadiationVol. 6(4)
Federico II University Hospital (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon