From Referee to Coach: Toward Smart Global Health Regulation

Developed from the 2025 Sir Alasdair Breckenridge Lecture, this Perspective draws on selective literature and illustrative examples from the United Kingdom, Singapore, and international frameworks. Adaptive, responsive, and agile approaches to regulation are well established in governance scholarship, yet their application to the combined challenges of health products, digital health-enabled services, and cross-border care remains fragmented. We argue that smart health regulation is best understood not as an entirely new paradigm, but as an integrative framework that synthesises adaptive, collaborative, and learning-oriented approaches for contemporary healthcare systems. The authors propose five practical design principles, four implementation mechanisms and an illustrative Smart Health Regulation Scorecard intended as non-validated heuristic for reflection rather than as a validated instrument or ranking system. The framework is informed by prior regulatory scholarship, comparative practice, the underlying lecture and the authors’ professional experience, and is offered to support discussion on how safety, innovation, accountability, and trust can be balanced across different regulatory settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14213740
Primary Topic
Healthcare Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Referee to Coach: Toward Smart Global Health Regulation

Eddie Han Pin Tan, John C. W. Lim, James Kingsland, Silke Vogel
Healthcare
Healthcare Regulation
article

From Referee to Coach: Toward Smart Global Health Regulation

Eddie Han Pin Tan, John C. W. Lim, James Kingsland, Silke Vogel
article en

Abstract

Developed from the 2025 Sir Alasdair Breckenridge Lecture, this Perspective draws on selective literature and illustrative examples from the United Kingdom, Singapore, and international frameworks. Adaptive, responsive, and agile approaches to regulation are well established in governance scholarship, yet their application to the combined challenges of health products, digital health-enabled services, and cross-border care remains fragmented. We argue that smart health regulation is best understood not as an entirely new paradigm, but as an integrative framework that synthesises adaptive, collaborative, and learning-oriented approaches for contemporary healthcare systems. The authors propose five practical design principles, four implementation mechanisms and an illustrative Smart Health Regulation Scorecard intended as non-validated heuristic for reflection rather than as a validated instrument or ranking system. The framework is informed by prior regulatory scholarship, comparative practice, the underlying lecture and the authors’ professional experience, and is offered to support discussion on how safety, innovation, accountability, and trust can be balanced across different regulatory settings.

HealthcareVol. 14(21)
National University of Singapore (SG), University of Lancashire (GB), Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Healthcare Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon