Traditional Relational Databases vs. NoSQL Databases: A Review of Differences and Application Scenarios

Since Codd proposed the relational model in 1970, relational databases have been widely adopted in enterprise data management because of their structured model, standardized SQL, and ACID transactions. With the growth of the Internet, cloud computing, and the Internet of Things, data volume, types, and business requirements have become increasingly diverse. Traditional relational databases therefore face new technical requirements in large-scale distributed, high-concurrency, and frequently changing schema scenarios. NoSQL databases have emerged with document, graph, key-value, and column-family models and distributed architectures. Using MongoDB and Neo4j as examples, this paper compares relational and NoSQL databases in technical characteristics and application scenarios, and examines e-commerce, social networks, financial risk control, and enterprise production management. It argues that the two paradigms are complementary rather than substitutive, and that database selection should balance data structure, transactional requirements, access patterns, and scalability. This study provides references for database selection, system architecture design, and data management optimization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied and Computational Engineering
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/2026.ba38542
Primary Topic
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traditional Relational Databases vs. NoSQL Databases: A Review of Differences and Application Scenarios

Qihao Li
Applied and Computational Engineering
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
article

Traditional Relational Databases vs. NoSQL Databases: A Review of Differences and Application Scenarios

Qihao Li
article en

Abstract

Since Codd proposed the relational model in 1970, relational databases have been widely adopted in enterprise data management because of their structured model, standardized SQL, and ACID transactions. With the growth of the Internet, cloud computing, and the Internet of Things, data volume, types, and business requirements have become increasingly diverse. Traditional relational databases therefore face new technical requirements in large-scale distributed, high-concurrency, and frequently changing schema scenarios. NoSQL databases have emerged with document, graph, key-value, and column-family models and distributed architectures. Using MongoDB and Neo4j as examples, this paper compares relational and NoSQL databases in technical characteristics and application scenarios, and examines e-commerce, social networks, financial risk control, and enterprise production management. It argues that the two paradigms are complementary rather than substitutive, and that database selection should balance data structure, transactional requirements, access patterns, and scalability. This study provides references for database selection, system architecture design, and data management optimization.

Applied and Computational EngineeringVol. 276(1)
Sichuan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Database Systems and Queries
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Traditional Relational Databases vs. NoSQL Databases: A Review of Differences and Application Scenarios — Qihao Li · Applied and Computational Engineering (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS