AI-Based MRI Radiomics for Preoperative Detection of Tumor Deposits in Rectal Cancer: A Bivariate Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-analysis

Background: In rectal cancer (RC), tumor deposits (TDs) are clinically important as they are associated with a negative impact on prognosis and affect risk stratification as well as management plans. MRI radiomics combined with artificial intelligence (AI) has been explored for non-invasive preoperative TDs detection. However, results vary across studies; therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to pool their diagnostic test accuracy (DTA). Methods: This systematic review and DTA meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy and reported in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA). Databases were screened for DTA studies of MRI-based radiomics predicting TDs in adult RC patients with histopathology as reference. Results: Nine studies (2589 patients) were identified. Across included studies, the bivariate meta-analysis showed pooled sensitivity of 0.765 (95% CI 0.714 - 0.809) and specificity of 0.790 (95% CI 0.750 - 0.825), with overall AUC of 0.845 and very low heterogeneity (I2 = 7.3%). In validation datasets, diagnostic performance remained consistent (AUC 0.806), with pooled sensitivity 0.751 (95% CI 0.681 - 0.809) and specificity 0.751 (95% CI 0.681 - 0.809). For MRI modality, T2 weighted image (T2WI) showed higher sensitivity (0.745) than T2WI plus diffusion weighted image (DWI) (0.697), while T2WI+DWI had higher specificity (0.809 vs 0.737) and AUC (0.829 vs 0.796), with no significant subgroup differences (p≥0.192). Models combining radiomics with clinical/radiological variables achieved significantly higher sensitivity (0.842 vs 0.657, p<0.001) and higher AUC (0.827 vs 0.752), with comparable specificity. Conclusion: MRI-based radiomics demonstrates good accuracy for preoperative detection of tumor deposits in RC. The integration of radiomics with clinical or imaging features increases the accuracy of identification. Amongst the MRI modalities, models that utilize the combination of T2WI plus DWI are more accurate than those using T2WI or DWI only.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.11.02.26367109
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

AI-Based MRI Radiomics for Preoperative Detection of Tumor Deposits in Rectal Cancer: A Bivariate Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-analysis

H. Abdelrazek, Alaa El‐Hussuna, Mohamed A. Alsaied, Mostafa Shalaby et al.
medRxiv
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
preprint

AI-Based MRI Radiomics for Preoperative Detection of Tumor Deposits in Rectal Cancer: A Bivariate Diagnostic Accuracy Meta-analysis

H. Abdelrazek, Alaa El‐Hussuna, Mohamed A. Alsaied, Mostafa Shalaby, Mahmoud Hegazy, Maab M. Saleh, Sedigheh Nazemi, Bassant Barakat, Omar Ramadan Ibrahim
preprint en

Abstract

Background: In rectal cancer (RC), tumor deposits (TDs) are clinically important as they are associated with a negative impact on prognosis and affect risk stratification as well as management plans. MRI radiomics combined with artificial intelligence (AI) has been explored for non-invasive preoperative TDs detection. However, results vary across studies; therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to pool their diagnostic test accuracy (DTA). Methods: This systematic review and DTA meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy and reported in adherence to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA). Databases were screened for DTA studies of MRI-based radiomics predicting TDs in adult RC patients with histopathology as reference. Results: Nine studies (2589 patients) were identified. Across included studies, the bivariate meta-analysis showed pooled sensitivity of 0.765 (95% CI 0.714 - 0.809) and specificity of 0.790 (95% CI 0.750 - 0.825), with overall AUC of 0.845 and very low heterogeneity (I2 = 7.3%). In validation datasets, diagnostic performance remained consistent (AUC 0.806), with pooled sensitivity 0.751 (95% CI 0.681 - 0.809) and specificity 0.751 (95% CI 0.681 - 0.809). For MRI modality, T2 weighted image (T2WI) showed higher sensitivity (0.745) than T2WI plus diffusion weighted image (DWI) (0.697), while T2WI+DWI had higher specificity (0.809 vs 0.737) and AUC (0.829 vs 0.796), with no significant subgroup differences (p≥0.192). Models combining radiomics with clinical/radiological variables achieved significantly higher sensitivity (0.842 vs 0.657, p<0.001) and higher AUC (0.827 vs 0.752), with comparable specificity. Conclusion: MRI-based radiomics demonstrates good accuracy for preoperative detection of tumor deposits in RC. The integration of radiomics with clinical or imaging features increases the accuracy of identification. Amongst the MRI modalities, models that utilize the combination of T2WI plus DWI are more accurate than those using T2WI or DWI only.

medRxiv
Mansoura University (EG), Mansoura University Hospital (EG), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon