Bridging the Gap: Data Privacy and Safety of Women

This paper looks at how far India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 actually succeeds in regulating the way companies collect, store, and use personal data, with particular attention paid to the gap left by newer technologies such as deepfakes and AI-generated content. Using doctrinal analysis and comparative reference to the United Kingdom and the European Union, it traces the development of Indian data protection law from the Information Technology Act, 2000 through Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India to the 2023 Act. This legal analysis is combined with primary survey data collected from seventy-seven respondents on their awareness, trust, and concern about corporate data handling. The findings show that public concern about how companies use personal data consistently outstrips trust that companies handle it responsibly, and that most respondents were unaware of the DPDP Act itself. The paper argues that while India's framework broadly matches global standards, it is not yet equipped to deal with AI-driven and gender-based harms, and that how effective it turns out to be will depend on enforcement through the Data Protection Board rather than on the text of the law alone.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Science Research and Review
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47814/fy6bvs82
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the Gap: Data Privacy and Safety of Women

Nikshit Sharma
International Journal of Social Science Research and Review
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

Bridging the Gap: Data Privacy and Safety of Women

Nikshit Sharma
article en

Abstract

This paper looks at how far India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 actually succeeds in regulating the way companies collect, store, and use personal data, with particular attention paid to the gap left by newer technologies such as deepfakes and AI-generated content. Using doctrinal analysis and comparative reference to the United Kingdom and the European Union, it traces the development of Indian data protection law from the Information Technology Act, 2000 through Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India to the 2023 Act. This legal analysis is combined with primary survey data collected from seventy-seven respondents on their awareness, trust, and concern about corporate data handling. The findings show that public concern about how companies use personal data consistently outstrips trust that companies handle it responsibly, and that most respondents were unaware of the DPDP Act itself. The paper argues that while India's framework broadly matches global standards, it is not yet equipped to deal with AI-driven and gender-based harms, and that how effective it turns out to be will depend on enforcement through the Data Protection Board rather than on the text of the law alone.

International Journal of Social Science Research and ReviewVol. 9(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Bridging the Gap: Data Privacy and Safety of Women — Nikshit Sharma · International Journal of Social Science Research and Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS