Rising cell-free DNA level tracks cancer-associated methylation signal and improves multicancer detection

Cancer patients carry more circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA)—small DNA fragments shed into the blood—than healthy people. Most of this excess comes not from the tumor itself but from immune cells, suggesting that it would simply dilute the much smaller amount of tumor-derived DNA in a blood sample. Using a study of 1,480 previously untreated participants across 43 hospitals—including patients with 14 cancer types spanning all stages, patients with benign growths, and healthy volunteers—we show the opposite: as total ccfDNA rises, it becomes enriched, not diluted, in fragments carrying cancer-associated DNA methylation signatures, independent of cancer type, disease stage, and a broad panel of demographic, clinical, and technical covariates. In fact, total ccfDNA explains more variance in cancer-associated methylation signal than the disease stage itself. This basic biological finding suggests a coupling between immune cell activity and tumor methylation. It also has a practical implication: we show that rising ccfDNA concentration is associated with higher cancer detection sensitivity, even within disease stages and particularly in early-stage disease—stage I sensitivity varied from 0.55 in the lowest ccfDNA concentration tertile to 0.85 in the highest, and stage II from 0.59 to 0.86. This suggests that ccfDNA concentration should be considered as a stage-independent stratification variable for benchmarking cancer-detection tests. Interestingly, similar behavior was observed in patients with symptomatic benign lesions, suggesting a broader biological response to abnormal tissue growth and not something unique to malignancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2629041123
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rising cell-free DNA level tracks cancer-associated methylation signal and improves multicancer detection

Vijay Chandru, Pallavi Ghana, Subuhi Yete, Divya Vishwanath et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Rising cell-free DNA level tracks cancer-associated methylation signal and improves multicancer detection

Vijay Chandru, Pallavi Ghana, Subuhi Yete, Divya Vishwanath, Abhisek Sarkar, Arya Nair, Aditi Chatterjee, Nihesh Rathod, Lavanya Nemani, Swaraj Basu, Badri Padhukasahasram, Sameer Phalke, Aneesha Radhakrishnan, Vamsi Veeramachaneni, Sewanti Atul Limaye, Arunima Ghosh, Ankita Khan, Ramesh Hariharan, Charles R. Cantor, Urvashi Bahadur, Lavanya Bollipalli, T Sthanusubramonian, Alfiya Beig, Kannadhasan Sekar, Prakash Hiremath, Bhanumathy G., Preetha R. T., Sarath R. A., Krithika Subramanian, Siddikuzzaman, Shashank Kumar
article en

Abstract

Cancer patients carry more circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA)—small DNA fragments shed into the blood—than healthy people. Most of this excess comes not from the tumor itself but from immune cells, suggesting that it would simply dilute the much smaller amount of tumor-derived DNA in a blood sample. Using a study of 1,480 previously untreated participants across 43 hospitals—including patients with 14 cancer types spanning all stages, patients with benign growths, and healthy volunteers—we show the opposite: as total ccfDNA rises, it becomes enriched, not diluted, in fragments carrying cancer-associated DNA methylation signatures, independent of cancer type, disease stage, and a broad panel of demographic, clinical, and technical covariates. In fact, total ccfDNA explains more variance in cancer-associated methylation signal than the disease stage itself. This basic biological finding suggests a coupling between immune cell activity and tumor methylation. It also has a practical implication: we show that rising ccfDNA concentration is associated with higher cancer detection sensitivity, even within disease stages and particularly in early-stage disease—stage I sensitivity varied from 0.55 in the lowest ccfDNA concentration tertile to 0.85 in the highest, and stage II from 0.59 to 0.86. This suggests that ccfDNA concentration should be considered as a stage-independent stratification variable for benchmarking cancer-detection tests. Interestingly, similar behavior was observed in patients with symptomatic benign lesions, suggesting a broader biological response to abnormal tissue growth and not something unique to malignancy.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(45)
Boston University (US), Strand Life Sciences (India) (IN), Sir H.N. Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon