Dissociable norepinephrine and dopamine representations during strategic decision-making and reward learning

Adaptive decision-making in competitive environments requires learning from immediate reward outcomes while tracking longer-timescale information to adjust behavioural strategies and remain unpredictable against others. Dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) have long been implicated in reward-guided behaviours, but their contributions to strategic choice remain unclear. We trained mice to play a zero-sum matching pennies game against a computer opponent that exploited regularities in their choice and reward history, such that optimal performance required stochastic choice decoupled from immediate reward. We combined fibre photometry recordings, behavioural and neural modelling, and a within-subject multi-task design to determine how NE and DA contribute to strategic choice in the matching pennies game versus reward-guided behaviour in a two-armed bandit (2AB) task. DA responses were dominated by trial-by-trial reward outcomes and consistently tracked model-derived reward prediction errors (RPE) across tasks and behavioural states. In contrast, NE activity reflected salient task events, predicted upcoming choice switches, and tracked longer-timescale variables including model-inferred behavioural strategy and average reward rate. In addition, NE responses were selectively enhanced following rewarded switches when these outcomes were informative for deciding whether to stay in or switch from the current strategy; and this enhancement could not be explained by RPE. Incorporating pre-choice NE activity into a reinforcement-learning model to modulate choice generation improved model prediction in matching pennies but not in the 2AB task. Together, these findings reveal complementary neuromodulatory correlates of competitive decision-making across timescales: DA primarily guides learning from immediate outcomes through RPE, whereas NE additionally represents contextual information and choice stochasticity relevant for shaping long-term strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.31.763226
Primary Topic
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Dissociable norepinephrine and dopamine representations during strategic decision-making and reward learning

Joseph O. Tutt, Timothy P.H. Sit, Chunyu A. Duan, Joschua Geuter et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
preprint

Dissociable norepinephrine and dopamine representations during strategic decision-making and reward learning

Joseph O. Tutt, Timothy P.H. Sit, Chunyu A. Duan, Joschua Geuter, Joanna Aloor
preprint en

Abstract

Adaptive decision-making in competitive environments requires learning from immediate reward outcomes while tracking longer-timescale information to adjust behavioural strategies and remain unpredictable against others. Dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) have long been implicated in reward-guided behaviours, but their contributions to strategic choice remain unclear. We trained mice to play a zero-sum matching pennies game against a computer opponent that exploited regularities in their choice and reward history, such that optimal performance required stochastic choice decoupled from immediate reward. We combined fibre photometry recordings, behavioural and neural modelling, and a within-subject multi-task design to determine how NE and DA contribute to strategic choice in the matching pennies game versus reward-guided behaviour in a two-armed bandit (2AB) task. DA responses were dominated by trial-by-trial reward outcomes and consistently tracked model-derived reward prediction errors (RPE) across tasks and behavioural states. In contrast, NE activity reflected salient task events, predicted upcoming choice switches, and tracked longer-timescale variables including model-inferred behavioural strategy and average reward rate. In addition, NE responses were selectively enhanced following rewarded switches when these outcomes were informative for deciding whether to stay in or switch from the current strategy; and this enhancement could not be explained by RPE. Incorporating pre-choice NE activity into a reinforcement-learning model to modulate choice generation improved model prediction in matching pennies but not in the 2AB task. Together, these findings reveal complementary neuromodulatory correlates of competitive decision-making across timescales: DA primarily guides learning from immediate outcomes through RPE, whereas NE additionally represents contextual information and choice stochasticity relevant for shaping long-term strategies.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Sainsbury Wellcome Centre (GB)
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon