Thermal Stability and Combustibility Characterization of Aluminium Composite Panel Core Materials

ABSTRACT Aluminium composite panels (ACPs) are widely used as facade cladding, including in aerodrome buildings, because they are lightweight, weather‐resistant and easy to fabricate. However, the combustibility of their core materials has raised serious fire safety concerns. In this study, five commercial ACP cores commonly used in Malaysia, namely limited‐combustible (A2), fire‐retardant (FR1, FR2, FR3) and polyethylene (PE), were extracted from the panels and characterized using Energy Dispersive X‐Ray Fluorescence (EDXRF), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA), Cone Calorimetry (CCM) at 50 kW/m 2 and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). EDXRF showed that A2 was dominated by calcium (75.7%), the FR cores contained lower calcium with notable aluminium, and the inorganic fraction of PE was mainly calcium, with smaller amounts of magnesium, titanium, aluminium and sodium. TGA showed that A2 retained 63.4% residue at 800°C, the FR cores 44.9–54.2%, and PE only 8.1%, indicating almost complete decomposition. In the CCM tests, PE ignited at 18.0 ± 1.7 s and reached a peak heat release rate (pHRR) of 684.4 ± 19.8 kW/m 2 , whereas A2 ignited at 60.7 ± 13.7 s with a pHRR of only 62.3 ± 16.6 kW/m 2 . The FR cores ignited between 34.0 and 63.0 s with pHRR values of 165.6–203.9 kW/m 2 , but continued flaming longer than both A2 and PE. SEM of the residues showed that A2 remained compact and intact, FR1 left a porous, partly fragmented residue, and PE left only a fragile, powdery residue. Overall, the results show a clear ranking of A2 > FR > PE in terms of heat release, mass loss and residue, providing practical guidance for safer ACP core selection, although system‐level testing is still required for full panel assemblies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Research
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/appl.70249
Primary Topic
Flame retardant materials and properties
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermal Stability and Combustibility Characterization of Aluminium Composite Panel Core Materials

Muhammad Imran Najeeb, Ahmad Faiz Tharima, Ashrul Riezal Asbar, Wan Nursheila Wan Jusoh et al.
Applied Research
Flame retardant materials and properties
article

Thermal Stability and Combustibility Characterization of Aluminium Composite Panel Core Materials

Muhammad Imran Najeeb, Ahmad Faiz Tharima, Ashrul Riezal Asbar, Wan Nursheila Wan Jusoh, Muhd Zulfadhli Muhd Zaimi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aluminium composite panels (ACPs) are widely used as facade cladding, including in aerodrome buildings, because they are lightweight, weather‐resistant and easy to fabricate. However, the combustibility of their core materials has raised serious fire safety concerns. In this study, five commercial ACP cores commonly used in Malaysia, namely limited‐combustible (A2), fire‐retardant (FR1, FR2, FR3) and polyethylene (PE), were extracted from the panels and characterized using Energy Dispersive X‐Ray Fluorescence (EDXRF), Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA), Cone Calorimetry (CCM) at 50 kW/m 2 and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). EDXRF showed that A2 was dominated by calcium (75.7%), the FR cores contained lower calcium with notable aluminium, and the inorganic fraction of PE was mainly calcium, with smaller amounts of magnesium, titanium, aluminium and sodium. TGA showed that A2 retained 63.4% residue at 800°C, the FR cores 44.9–54.2%, and PE only 8.1%, indicating almost complete decomposition. In the CCM tests, PE ignited at 18.0 ± 1.7 s and reached a peak heat release rate (pHRR) of 684.4 ± 19.8 kW/m 2 , whereas A2 ignited at 60.7 ± 13.7 s with a pHRR of only 62.3 ± 16.6 kW/m 2 . The FR cores ignited between 34.0 and 63.0 s with pHRR values of 165.6–203.9 kW/m 2 , but continued flaming longer than both A2 and PE. SEM of the residues showed that A2 remained compact and intact, FR1 left a porous, partly fragmented residue, and PE left only a fragile, powdery residue. Overall, the results show a clear ranking of A2 > FR > PE in terms of heat release, mass loss and residue, providing practical guidance for safer ACP core selection, although system‐level testing is still required for full panel assemblies.

Applied ResearchVol. 5(6)
University of Kuala Lumpur (MY), National University of Malaysia (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Flame retardant materials and properties
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon