Foveal Crowding and Reduced Binocular Advantage In Myopic Anisometropia Under Brief Stimulus Presentation

Purpose To examine whether myopic anisometropia (MA) influences foveal crowding, binocular advantage, and the balance of monocular contributions to binocular vision under brief stimulus presentation.Methods Twenty-two participants were recruited, including 5 with high MA (HMA; mean age 23.20 ± 3.03 years), 9 with low MA (LMA; mean age 24.00 ± 2.78 years), and 8 with non-MA (NMA; mean age 26.88 ± 2.23 years). All participants completed a letter orientation discrimination task under crowded and uncrowded conditions. Sensitivity (D-prime, d’), response time (RT), binocular summation, and the monocular contributions to binocular performance were measured.Results Foveal crowding was present in all groups under brief stimulus presentation, with no interocular differences within any group. Crowding consistently reduced sensitivity and increased RT across all groups (p < 0.05), while longer presentation durations improved both measures. Notably, the HMA group was the only group that showed no increase in binocular sensitivity relative to monocular at any presentation duration. At 82 ms duration, the LMA group responded more slowly than the NMA group (p < 0.05), while at longer durations (129 ms and 247 ms), the LMA group responded more slowly than the HMA group (p < 0.05). At the shortest duration (47 ms), both MA groups showed a weaker binocular advantage than the NMA group (p < 0.05). Only the NMA group demonstrated a reduction in binocular advantage as presentation time increased (p < 0.05). Further analysis indicated that, while the HMA group maintained a more stable but more unbalanced binocular input contribution.Conclusions In optically corrected MA patients, brief stimulus presentation revealed abnormal foveal crowding in response time and a reduced binocular advantage, suggesting decreased efficiency in processing visual information under high perceptual demand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Eye Research
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2026.2693569
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foveal Crowding and Reduced Binocular Advantage In Myopic Anisometropia Under Brief Stimulus Presentation

Qiong Ma, Hongsheng Bi, Huayue Sun, Ruixin Wu et al.
Current Eye Research
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Foveal Crowding and Reduced Binocular Advantage In Myopic Anisometropia Under Brief Stimulus Presentation

Qiong Ma, Hongsheng Bi, Huayue Sun, Ruixin Wu, Weilun Jiao, Jianfeng Wu, Lihan Wang, Chao Zhang
article en

Abstract

Purpose To examine whether myopic anisometropia (MA) influences foveal crowding, binocular advantage, and the balance of monocular contributions to binocular vision under brief stimulus presentation.Methods Twenty-two participants were recruited, including 5 with high MA (HMA; mean age 23.20 ± 3.03 years), 9 with low MA (LMA; mean age 24.00 ± 2.78 years), and 8 with non-MA (NMA; mean age 26.88 ± 2.23 years). All participants completed a letter orientation discrimination task under crowded and uncrowded conditions. Sensitivity (D-prime, d’), response time (RT), binocular summation, and the monocular contributions to binocular performance were measured.Results Foveal crowding was present in all groups under brief stimulus presentation, with no interocular differences within any group. Crowding consistently reduced sensitivity and increased RT across all groups (p < 0.05), while longer presentation durations improved both measures. Notably, the HMA group was the only group that showed no increase in binocular sensitivity relative to monocular at any presentation duration. At 82 ms duration, the LMA group responded more slowly than the NMA group (p < 0.05), while at longer durations (129 ms and 247 ms), the LMA group responded more slowly than the HMA group (p < 0.05). At the shortest duration (47 ms), both MA groups showed a weaker binocular advantage than the NMA group (p < 0.05). Only the NMA group demonstrated a reduction in binocular advantage as presentation time increased (p < 0.05). Further analysis indicated that, while the HMA group maintained a more stable but more unbalanced binocular input contribution.Conclusions In optically corrected MA patients, brief stimulus presentation revealed abnormal foveal crowding in response time and a reduced binocular advantage, suggesting decreased efficiency in processing visual information under high perceptual demand.

Current Eye Research
Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University (CN), Shandong Shierming Eye Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon