Moral Re-Armament, “Sound Homes,” and Familial Unity as an Antitheory of Power

This article uses a case study of Moral Re-Armament (MRA), a twentieth-century Christian social movement, to explain how family remains a durable element of American political culture. When groups or political actors criticize—or theorize—dominant models of family life as too restrictive on individual members, especially women as mothers and children, defenders of the heteropatriarchal family step in to assert that the family is really a site of unity among members. As one such defensive movement, MRA idealized families as harmonious, offering what I call an “antitheory” of power dynamics within the family. This antitheory counteracts previous critiques of the family by absorbing and deploying elements of their critique. Such discursive repurposing makes new political formulations possible, and, in the case of MRA, the antitheory of familial power allowed the movement to apply its insights about the need for unity among workers and industrialists as America entered the Second World War. In conclusion, I show how this discursive innovation created space for the twinned defenses of “family values” and free market capitalism among neoliberals in the second half of the twentieth century.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genealogy
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy10050192
Primary Topic
Gender and Feminist Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Moral Re-Armament, “Sound Homes,” and Familial Unity as an Antitheory of Power

Helene Williams
Genealogy
Gender and Feminist Studies
article

Moral Re-Armament, “Sound Homes,” and Familial Unity as an Antitheory of Power

Helene Williams
article en

Abstract

This article uses a case study of Moral Re-Armament (MRA), a twentieth-century Christian social movement, to explain how family remains a durable element of American political culture. When groups or political actors criticize—or theorize—dominant models of family life as too restrictive on individual members, especially women as mothers and children, defenders of the heteropatriarchal family step in to assert that the family is really a site of unity among members. As one such defensive movement, MRA idealized families as harmonious, offering what I call an “antitheory” of power dynamics within the family. This antitheory counteracts previous critiques of the family by absorbing and deploying elements of their critique. Such discursive repurposing makes new political formulations possible, and, in the case of MRA, the antitheory of familial power allowed the movement to apply its insights about the need for unity among workers and industrialists as America entered the Second World War. In conclusion, I show how this discursive innovation created space for the twinned defenses of “family values” and free market capitalism among neoliberals in the second half of the twentieth century.

GenealogyVol. 10(5)
Western Connecticut State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gender and Feminist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon