Pediatric palliative care research participation: do adolescent and adult patients and caregivers find it acceptable?

Introduction Palliative care has matured as a life-span field with an increasing research base. Advancing the field means understanding why patients and caregivers participate in palliative care research, and participation’s benefits and burdens. This study extended previous work to include greater diversity of clinical sampling and study design. Methods Prospective, multi-methods study examined reported benefits, burdens, and motivations associated with participation in pediatric palliative care research. Study pParticipants included patients, caregivers, and family members who enrolled in pediatric palliative care research, as well as individuals declining participation, within a single quaternary pediatric hospital system. Structured questionnaires were administered at enrollment and study completion; qualitative responses were analyzed thematically. Results 57 participants completed the questionnaires. Altruism and personal benefit were the most frequently cited motivations for enrollment at baseline and study completion. Emotional expression and the opportunity to help others were commonly identified as positive aspects of participation. The majority reported no discomfort and indicated willingness to participate in future research. The most frequent reasons given for declining participation were feeling overwhelmed, lack of interest, or study-specific aversion, rather than distress associated with palliative care research iPPC involvement. Discussion Participants consistently reported greater benefit than burden, suggesting that pediatric palliative care research participation is acceptable and often meaningful. Given the pre/post design, the findings suggest eligible participants are able to determine if actual study participation is likely beneficial for them or not. Supporting families as they consider research participation promotes ethical, sensitive, and inclusive research design. Identified patterns may guide research design for future investigators to continue to advance the science of pediatric palliative care across the lifespanresearch.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1959488
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pediatric palliative care research participation: do adolescent and adult patients and caregivers find it acceptable?

Pamela S. Hinds, Sarah E. Friebert, Daniel H. Grossoehme, Kim Mooney-Doyle et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Pediatric palliative care research participation: do adolescent and adult patients and caregivers find it acceptable?

Pamela S. Hinds, Sarah E. Friebert, Daniel H. Grossoehme, Kim Mooney-Doyle, Tarak Doshi, Diana Brailita
article en

Abstract

Introduction Palliative care has matured as a life-span field with an increasing research base. Advancing the field means understanding why patients and caregivers participate in palliative care research, and participation’s benefits and burdens. This study extended previous work to include greater diversity of clinical sampling and study design. Methods Prospective, multi-methods study examined reported benefits, burdens, and motivations associated with participation in pediatric palliative care research. Study pParticipants included patients, caregivers, and family members who enrolled in pediatric palliative care research, as well as individuals declining participation, within a single quaternary pediatric hospital system. Structured questionnaires were administered at enrollment and study completion; qualitative responses were analyzed thematically. Results 57 participants completed the questionnaires. Altruism and personal benefit were the most frequently cited motivations for enrollment at baseline and study completion. Emotional expression and the opportunity to help others were commonly identified as positive aspects of participation. The majority reported no discomfort and indicated willingness to participate in future research. The most frequent reasons given for declining participation were feeling overwhelmed, lack of interest, or study-specific aversion, rather than distress associated with palliative care research iPPC involvement. Discussion Participants consistently reported greater benefit than burden, suggesting that pediatric palliative care research participation is acceptable and often meaningful. Given the pre/post design, the findings suggest eligible participants are able to determine if actual study participation is likely beneficial for them or not. Supporting families as they consider research participation promotes ethical, sensitive, and inclusive research design. Identified patterns may guide research design for future investigators to continue to advance the science of pediatric palliative care across the lifespanresearch.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), George Washington University Hospital (US), George Washington University (US), Akron Children's Hospital (US), Northeast Ohio Medical University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon