When the Chatbot Keeps Saying Yes: A Runtime Warning Number for Delusional Spiralling. Which Company Will Do It First in the World?

People are falling into false beliefs after long conversations with AI chatbots. The cause most often named is sycophancy, the chatbot's habit of agreeing with and praising whatever the user says. A recent MIT model shows that even a perfectly rational user can be pulled into a spiral. It also shows that two obvious fixes, a chatbot that says only true things and a user who has been warned, reduce the problem but do not remove it. This concept note points to a gap. Existing studies measure the spiral afterwards from chat logs, and existing guardrail tools check one message at a time. In the searches made for this note, no published method was found that calculates a warning number from the running conversation and lets the computer decide a shunting action from it, without waiting for a person. The note describes who could use such a monitor: makers of chatbots, platforms that supply ready-made chatbots to businesses, and companies that sell guardrail tools. It ends with a question: which company will be the first in the world to do it, and declare it? Keywords: sycophancy, delusional spiralling, AI chatbots, early warning, warning number, shunting action, runtime monitor, AI safety

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23911896
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When the Chatbot Keeps Saying Yes: A Runtime Warning Number for Delusional Spiralling. Which Company Will Do It First in the World?

Prakash Vaithyanathan
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

When the Chatbot Keeps Saying Yes: A Runtime Warning Number for Delusional Spiralling. Which Company Will Do It First in the World?

Prakash Vaithyanathan
article en

Abstract

People are falling into false beliefs after long conversations with AI chatbots. The cause most often named is sycophancy, the chatbot's habit of agreeing with and praising whatever the user says. A recent MIT model shows that even a perfectly rational user can be pulled into a spiral. It also shows that two obvious fixes, a chatbot that says only true things and a user who has been warned, reduce the problem but do not remove it. This concept note points to a gap. Existing studies measure the spiral afterwards from chat logs, and existing guardrail tools check one message at a time. In the searches made for this note, no published method was found that calculates a warning number from the running conversation and lets the computer decide a shunting action from it, without waiting for a person. The note describes who could use such a monitor: makers of chatbots, platforms that supply ready-made chatbots to businesses, and companies that sell guardrail tools. It ends with a question: which company will be the first in the world to do it, and declare it? Keywords: sycophancy, delusional spiralling, AI chatbots, early warning, warning number, shunting action, runtime monitor, AI safety

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon