A scoping review of psychosocial factors of climate change inaction: Implications for climate change communication and education

Abstract Climate change communication and education efforts often focus on the cognitive aspects of addressing climate change, emphasizing that a key path to solving climate change-related challenges may be achieved through an educated public that better understands the science of this issue. However, despite decades of information-heavy communication and education efforts, designed with knowledge-related outcomes in mind, meaningful and sustained action to address climate change has yet to occur at a broad scale. This lack of effective, sustained action has motivated researchers from a range of fields to examine other factors that prevent climate change action. We undertook a systematic scoping review of peer-reviewed, empirical studies (n = 92) focusing on psychological and sociological (psychosocial) factors associated with climate change inaction. Through thematic analysis, we identified trends and patterns across the studies, but also noted that no obvious list of discrete psychosocial factors leading to climate inaction emerged. Political ideology and emotions were the most common factors discussed as influencing climate change inaction. Other psychosocial factors receiving notable attention included climate change perceptions, trust in institutions and leaders, values, and efficacy beliefs. The most-recommended strategies for improving effectiveness of climate change communication and education were attending to climate-related emotions; addressing issues of ideology and trust; and targeting systemic and structural barriers. Findings also emphasize that quality climate communication and education must acknowledge and build on people's unique relationships with their places, communities, and stories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aebcfd
Primary Topic
Climate Change Communication and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of psychosocial factors of climate change inaction: Implications for climate change communication and education

Nicole M. Ardoin, Marcia McKenzie, Kathleen O’Connor, Alison W. Bowers
Environmental Research Letters
Climate Change Communication and Perception
article

A scoping review of psychosocial factors of climate change inaction: Implications for climate change communication and education

Nicole M. Ardoin, Marcia McKenzie, Kathleen O’Connor, Alison W. Bowers
article en

Abstract

Abstract Climate change communication and education efforts often focus on the cognitive aspects of addressing climate change, emphasizing that a key path to solving climate change-related challenges may be achieved through an educated public that better understands the science of this issue. However, despite decades of information-heavy communication and education efforts, designed with knowledge-related outcomes in mind, meaningful and sustained action to address climate change has yet to occur at a broad scale. This lack of effective, sustained action has motivated researchers from a range of fields to examine other factors that prevent climate change action. We undertook a systematic scoping review of peer-reviewed, empirical studies (n = 92) focusing on psychological and sociological (psychosocial) factors associated with climate change inaction. Through thematic analysis, we identified trends and patterns across the studies, but also noted that no obvious list of discrete psychosocial factors leading to climate inaction emerged. Political ideology and emotions were the most common factors discussed as influencing climate change inaction. Other psychosocial factors receiving notable attention included climate change perceptions, trust in institutions and leaders, values, and efficacy beliefs. The most-recommended strategies for improving effectiveness of climate change communication and education were attending to climate-related emotions; addressing issues of ideology and trust; and targeting systemic and structural barriers. Findings also emphasize that quality climate communication and education must acknowledge and build on people's unique relationships with their places, communities, and stories.

Environmental Research Letters
The University of Melbourne (AU), TCC Group (United States) (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate Change Communication and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon