Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery

Abstract Objective To compare perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), focusing on drain duration, hospital stay, postoperative pain, and opioid use. Methodology A retrospective analysis of 38 patients undergoing LVRS (21 RATS, 17 VATS) was performed. comparisons were made for chest drain duration, length of stay (LOS), pain scores, and cumulative opioid consumption (oral morphine-equivalent mg). Baseline parameters (age, sex, preoperative COPD Assessment Test score, six-minute walk test, residual volume, and diffusing capacity for CO were also assessed. An exploratory cost-consequence analysis using institutional costing data and Hospital Episode Statistics was undertaken as a service-evaluation and interpreted cautiously.Birmingham Results Baseline demographics and physiological parameters were broadly similar between groups. Chest-drain duration was significantly shorter in the RATS cohort than in the VATS cohort (4.6 ± 1.9 vs. 10.8 ± 6.1 days, p = 0.002). Length of hospital stay showed a non-significant trend toward shorter stay following RATS (median 8.0 [3.3–10.0] vs. 12.0 [6.0–18.0] days, p = 0.14). Pain scores were comparable at all measured time points. Despite this, opioid use over the first 72 h was significantly lower in RATS (38 ± 12 mg) than in VATS (54 ± 18 mg, p = 0.01). Exploratory health-economic modelling suggested possible cost neutrality, but these estimates should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating only. Conclusion In our retrospective single-center cohort, robotic-assisted LVRS was associated with shorter chest-drain duration, lower early opioid requirement, and a statistically non-significant shorter hospital stay compared with VATS approach, while reported pain scores were similar. These observational findings including the exploratory health-economic analysis, should be confirmed in larger adjusted prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-026-04563-2
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery

Babu V Naidu, Hazem B. Fallouh, Akshay Patel, Hamed Ahmed
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lung volume reduction surgery

Babu V Naidu, Hazem B. Fallouh, Akshay Patel, Hamed Ahmed
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To compare perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS), focusing on drain duration, hospital stay, postoperative pain, and opioid use. Methodology A retrospective analysis of 38 patients undergoing LVRS (21 RATS, 17 VATS) was performed. comparisons were made for chest drain duration, length of stay (LOS), pain scores, and cumulative opioid consumption (oral morphine-equivalent mg). Baseline parameters (age, sex, preoperative COPD Assessment Test score, six-minute walk test, residual volume, and diffusing capacity for CO were also assessed. An exploratory cost-consequence analysis using institutional costing data and Hospital Episode Statistics was undertaken as a service-evaluation and interpreted cautiously.Birmingham Results Baseline demographics and physiological parameters were broadly similar between groups. Chest-drain duration was significantly shorter in the RATS cohort than in the VATS cohort (4.6 ± 1.9 vs. 10.8 ± 6.1 days, p = 0.002). Length of hospital stay showed a non-significant trend toward shorter stay following RATS (median 8.0 [3.3–10.0] vs. 12.0 [6.0–18.0] days, p = 0.14). Pain scores were comparable at all measured time points. Despite this, opioid use over the first 72 h was significantly lower in RATS (38 ± 12 mg) than in VATS (54 ± 18 mg, p = 0.01). Exploratory health-economic modelling suggested possible cost neutrality, but these estimates should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating only. Conclusion In our retrospective single-center cohort, robotic-assisted LVRS was associated with shorter chest-drain duration, lower early opioid requirement, and a statistically non-significant shorter hospital stay compared with VATS approach, while reported pain scores were similar. These observational findings including the exploratory health-economic analysis, should be confirmed in larger adjusted prospective studies.

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon