Native English‐Speaking Supervisor Linguistic Justice Scale: Instrument Development and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

ABSTRACT This study operationalized the construct of linguistic justice in clinical supervision and presented the results of validating such measurement instrument to assess native English‐speaking supervisors’ competence with emerging multilingual learner (EML) supervisees. Items for the Linguistic Justice Scale (LJS) came from authors’ prior qualitative research, multilingual supervision literature, and expert input; 146 clinical supervisors completed the survey. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) assessed construct validity and internal consistency used Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. CFA supported a multilayer model with three domains and six factors, 31‐item structure: Advocacy for Linguistic Equity, Linguistic Humility and Sensitivity, Linguistic and Cultural Knowledge, Reciprocal and Strength‐Based Practices, Inclusive Communication, Research‐Based Practice. Model showed acceptable fit (CFI = 0.903, RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.066), with significant factor loadings. Internal consistency was excellent ( α = 0.93, ω = 0.93). The LJS is the first empirical, multidimensional measure of linguistic justice in supervision, providing a validated tool and framework to guide linguistically equitable, culturally sustaining practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Counselor Education and Supervision
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.70046
Primary Topic
Counseling Practices and Supervision
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Native English‐Speaking Supervisor Linguistic Justice Scale: Instrument Development and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Hsin‐Ya Tang, Jie Zhang, Yiying Xiong, Yu‐Ting Cheng
Counselor Education and Supervision
Counseling Practices and Supervision
article

Native English‐Speaking Supervisor Linguistic Justice Scale: Instrument Development and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Hsin‐Ya Tang, Jie Zhang, Yiying Xiong, Yu‐Ting Cheng
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study operationalized the construct of linguistic justice in clinical supervision and presented the results of validating such measurement instrument to assess native English‐speaking supervisors’ competence with emerging multilingual learner (EML) supervisees. Items for the Linguistic Justice Scale (LJS) came from authors’ prior qualitative research, multilingual supervision literature, and expert input; 146 clinical supervisors completed the survey. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) assessed construct validity and internal consistency used Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega. CFA supported a multilayer model with three domains and six factors, 31‐item structure: Advocacy for Linguistic Equity, Linguistic Humility and Sensitivity, Linguistic and Cultural Knowledge, Reciprocal and Strength‐Based Practices, Inclusive Communication, Research‐Based Practice. Model showed acceptable fit (CFI = 0.903, RMSEA = 0.047, SRMR = 0.066), with significant factor loadings. Internal consistency was excellent ( α = 0.93, ω = 0.93). The LJS is the first empirical, multidimensional measure of linguistic justice in supervision, providing a validated tool and framework to guide linguistically equitable, culturally sustaining practices.

Counselor Education and Supervision
North Carolina State University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Counseling Practices and Supervision
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon