PRECISION MEDICINE FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: UTILIZING AIENHANCED MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION IN BIOMARKER SELECTION

Objective: To investigate the role that precision medicine, biomarker selection, Mendelian randomization, and artificial intelligence have in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and to examine the correlation with clinical implementation and translation. Methods: The sample included 288 healthcare professionals from related clinical or biomedical fields, as well as researchers. Data were gathered on the following dimensions: Precision Medicine, Biomarker Selection, Mendelian Randomization, Artificial Intelligence, and Implementation/Translation, using a structured 30-item questionnaire. The answers were captured on a 5-point rating scale. The ShapiroWilk normality test, Cronbach's alpha, Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin test, Bartlett test, independent-samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test, Chi-square test, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression were used in the statistical analysis. The significance level used for statistical tests was p<0.05. Results: Cronbach's alpha values obtained for the different scales of the questionnaire revealed high internal consistency ranging from 0.929 to 0.959, and an overall Cronbach's alpha value was 0.984. Sampling adequacy was excellent (KMO=0.983), while Bartlett's test was significant (χ²=9427.46, df=435, p<0.001). Professional role (p<0.001), age (p<0.001), and gender (p<0.001) were each shown to have significant differences. The correlation coefficients between all the main constructs of the study were positive and strong, ranging from about 0.819 to 0.852. Implementation/Translation was significantly and positively related to Artificial Intelligence (r=0.852, p<0.001). Precision Medicine, Biomarker Selection, Mendelian Randomization, and Artificial Intelligence were identified as significant positive predictors of Implementation/Translation, which explained 80.0% of the variance (R²=0.800, adjusted R²=0.797, p<0.001) in multiple regression analysis. Conclusion: Mendelian randomization combined with AI could be a useful approach to prioritizing biomarkers and precision medicines in rheumatoid arthritis. The principal constructs are strongly connected with each other and allow for further research on validated clinical and genomic data sets. These results are methodological and not clinical data, as the data used for the present analysis were synthetic/mock data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25258/ijddt.16.86s.112
Primary Topic
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PRECISION MEDICINE FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: UTILIZING AIENHANCED MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION IN BIOMARKER SELECTION

Avrina Kartika Ririe, E.N. Ganesh, Adam Zack Friday, Precious E. Onyeukwu
International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
article

PRECISION MEDICINE FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: UTILIZING AIENHANCED MENDELIAN RANDOMIZATION IN BIOMARKER SELECTION

Avrina Kartika Ririe, E.N. Ganesh, Adam Zack Friday, Precious E. Onyeukwu
article en

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the role that precision medicine, biomarker selection, Mendelian randomization, and artificial intelligence have in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and to examine the correlation with clinical implementation and translation. Methods: The sample included 288 healthcare professionals from related clinical or biomedical fields, as well as researchers. Data were gathered on the following dimensions: Precision Medicine, Biomarker Selection, Mendelian Randomization, Artificial Intelligence, and Implementation/Translation, using a structured 30-item questionnaire. The answers were captured on a 5-point rating scale. The ShapiroWilk normality test, Cronbach's alpha, Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin test, Bartlett test, independent-samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis test, Chi-square test, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression were used in the statistical analysis. The significance level used for statistical tests was p<0.05. Results: Cronbach's alpha values obtained for the different scales of the questionnaire revealed high internal consistency ranging from 0.929 to 0.959, and an overall Cronbach's alpha value was 0.984. Sampling adequacy was excellent (KMO=0.983), while Bartlett's test was significant (χ²=9427.46, df=435, p<0.001). Professional role (p<0.001), age (p<0.001), and gender (p<0.001) were each shown to have significant differences. The correlation coefficients between all the main constructs of the study were positive and strong, ranging from about 0.819 to 0.852. Implementation/Translation was significantly and positively related to Artificial Intelligence (r=0.852, p<0.001). Precision Medicine, Biomarker Selection, Mendelian Randomization, and Artificial Intelligence were identified as significant positive predictors of Implementation/Translation, which explained 80.0% of the variance (R²=0.800, adjusted R²=0.797, p<0.001) in multiple regression analysis. Conclusion: Mendelian randomization combined with AI could be a useful approach to prioritizing biomarkers and precision medicines in rheumatoid arthritis. The principal constructs are strongly connected with each other and allow for further research on validated clinical and genomic data sets. These results are methodological and not clinical data, as the data used for the present analysis were synthetic/mock data.

International Journal of Drug Delivery TechnologyVol. 16(86s)
University of California, Los Angeles (US), UCLA Health (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon