Plant Endophytic Microorganisms and Anticancer Natural Products: A Critical Reappraisal of Biosynthetic Evidence and Mechanistic Claims

Endophytic microorganisms have attracted considerable attention as a potential resource for the discovery and sustainable production of anticancer natural products. However, studies reporting the detection of target compounds from bacterial/fungal strains or elevated levels of these compounds in host plants do not constitute conclusive evidence that the microorganisms possess the capacity for independent de novo biosynthesis or are directly involved in their biosynthetic pathways. Therefore, there is a pressing need to establish an evaluation framework capable of distinguishing the genuine contribution of endophytes from false-positive signals. In this review, we systematically summarize research progress on endophytic microorganisms associated with paclitaxel, camptothecin, Catharanthus alkaloids, and podophyllotoxin as representative cases. We propose a central hypothesis that endophytes are dynamic participants in plant–microbe metabolic networks and can cooperate with their hosts to synthesize anticancer natural products through multiple mechanisms. A dual-standard evaluation system—comprising three levels of evidence and four categories of limitations—is employed to assess the quality of existing studies on microbial synthesis of plant-derived antitumor metabolites. Currently, a large number of reports remain at the level of mere in vitro culture and detection, lacking mechanistic evidence from genetic or isotopic tracing studies, which results in blurred boundaries between host residue and genuine microbial synthesis. We structurally classify endophytic contribution mechanisms into distinct types, including autonomous synthesis, host-induced synthesis, and co-metabolic conversion, and grade the quality of existing studies according to evidence strength. This dual-standard framework provides an evaluative basis for delineating the boundaries among autonomous synthesis, host induction, co-metabolic conversion, and contamination misassignment, while offering an evidence-based standard to guide the screening of anticancer endophyte resources, optimization of experimental design, and decision-making regarding microbial alternative production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Microorganisms
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14112495
Primary Topic
Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plant Endophytic Microorganisms and Anticancer Natural Products: A Critical Reappraisal of Biosynthetic Evidence and Mechanistic Claims

黃美嫆, Long Chen, Miao Zhang, Zhonghua DAI et al.
Microorganisms
Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
article

Plant Endophytic Microorganisms and Anticancer Natural Products: A Critical Reappraisal of Biosynthetic Evidence and Mechanistic Claims

黃美嫆, Long Chen, Miao Zhang, Zhonghua DAI, Hua Zhu, Yuzhen Lin
article en

Abstract

Endophytic microorganisms have attracted considerable attention as a potential resource for the discovery and sustainable production of anticancer natural products. However, studies reporting the detection of target compounds from bacterial/fungal strains or elevated levels of these compounds in host plants do not constitute conclusive evidence that the microorganisms possess the capacity for independent de novo biosynthesis or are directly involved in their biosynthetic pathways. Therefore, there is a pressing need to establish an evaluation framework capable of distinguishing the genuine contribution of endophytes from false-positive signals. In this review, we systematically summarize research progress on endophytic microorganisms associated with paclitaxel, camptothecin, Catharanthus alkaloids, and podophyllotoxin as representative cases. We propose a central hypothesis that endophytes are dynamic participants in plant–microbe metabolic networks and can cooperate with their hosts to synthesize anticancer natural products through multiple mechanisms. A dual-standard evaluation system—comprising three levels of evidence and four categories of limitations—is employed to assess the quality of existing studies on microbial synthesis of plant-derived antitumor metabolites. Currently, a large number of reports remain at the level of mere in vitro culture and detection, lacking mechanistic evidence from genetic or isotopic tracing studies, which results in blurred boundaries between host residue and genuine microbial synthesis. We structurally classify endophytic contribution mechanisms into distinct types, including autonomous synthesis, host-induced synthesis, and co-metabolic conversion, and grade the quality of existing studies according to evidence strength. This dual-standard framework provides an evaluative basis for delineating the boundaries among autonomous synthesis, host induction, co-metabolic conversion, and contamination misassignment, while offering an evidence-based standard to guide the screening of anticancer endophyte resources, optimization of experimental design, and decision-making regarding microbial alternative production.

MicroorganismsVol. 14(11)
Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Institute for Ethnic Studies (SI), Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon