Kinsella Revisited: Concentration and Diversification in the Post-Cold War Arms Trade Network, 2005–2025

This study extends David Kinsella’s (2003) social network analysis of the international arms trade into the present, asking how far the marketization he anticipated has in fact proceeded. Using the SIPRI Arms Transfers Database for the 2004–2025 period and five annual cross-sections (2005, 2010, 2015, 2020, and 2025), a directed, weighted supplier–recipient network is constructed for each year. Network density, out-degree centrality, group centralization, and the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI) are used to assess whether the supplier structure has become more dispersed or more concentrated. Contrary to Kinsella’s expectation of progressive marketization, centralization rises from 0.36 in 2005 to 0.54 in 2025 and the HHI rises in parallel, indicating deepening supplier concentration. Beneath this aggregate trend lies a dual dynamic: consolidation at the top of the hierarchy—most visibly the decline of Russia—alongside the entry of new lower-tier suppliers such as Turkiye and South Korea. The findings suggest that concentration and diversification have proceeded simultaneously rather than as uniform marketization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of international relations and political science studies.
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69494/jirps.2000991
Primary Topic
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kinsella Revisited: Concentration and Diversification in the Post-Cold War Arms Trade Network, 2005–2025

Nagehan Reyhan Doğan
Journal of international relations and political science studies.
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
article

Kinsella Revisited: Concentration and Diversification in the Post-Cold War Arms Trade Network, 2005–2025

Nagehan Reyhan Doğan
article en

Abstract

This study extends David Kinsella’s (2003) social network analysis of the international arms trade into the present, asking how far the marketization he anticipated has in fact proceeded. Using the SIPRI Arms Transfers Database for the 2004–2025 period and five annual cross-sections (2005, 2010, 2015, 2020, and 2025), a directed, weighted supplier–recipient network is constructed for each year. Network density, out-degree centrality, group centralization, and the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI) are used to assess whether the supplier structure has become more dispersed or more concentrated. Contrary to Kinsella’s expectation of progressive marketization, centralization rises from 0.36 in 2005 to 0.54 in 2025 and the HHI rises in parallel, indicating deepening supplier concentration. Beneath this aggregate trend lies a dual dynamic: consolidation at the top of the hierarchy—most visibly the decline of Russia—alongside the entry of new lower-tier suppliers such as Turkiye and South Korea. The findings suggest that concentration and diversification have proceeded simultaneously rather than as uniform marketization.

Journal of international relations and political science studies.(16)
Istanbul University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon