Cardiac and Hemodynamic Responses to Resistance Training Sessions with and Without Blood Flow Restriction Performed to Muscular Failure

This study investigated the acute cardiac and hemodynamic responses to high-intensity resistance training (HIRT), low-intensity resistance training (LIRT), and low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction (LIRT+BFR) during sessions composed of sequential exercises performed to muscular failure. Fourteen resistance-trained men (age: 21.8 ± 1.7 years; height: 178.3 ± 8.3 cm; body mass: 76.0 ± 8.1 kg) completed a repeated-measures crossover design in which each participant performed all three experimental conditions in a fixed, non-randomized order: HIRT (four sets at 70% 1RM), LIRT (four sets at 30% 1RM), and LIRT+BFR (four sets at 30% 1RM with a fixed cuff pressure of 80 mmHg), all executed in repetition-to-failure mode. Heart rate (HR), rate–pressure product (RPP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured at rest, immediately after each session, and 30 min post-exercise. At the end of the sessions, HIRT, LIRT, and LIRT+BFR all showed significant increases in HR, RPP, SBP, MAP, and DBP compared with resting values (p < 0.01), with no differences between protocols. Delta values (pre–post changes) were similar across protocols. Post-exercise, HR and RPP remained elevated compared with baseline in all protocols (p < 0.01), with no differences between them. SBP and MAP were reduced when compared with rest at 30 min post-exercise in HIRT, LIRT, and LIRT+BFR (p < 0.05), with no differences among protocols. For DBP, only LI showed a reduction compared with the rest (p < 0.01); however, LIRT+BFR values were significantly higher than HIRT (p < 0.01) and LIRT (p < 0.01). No statistically significant between-protocol differences were observed for the immediate post-exercise cardiac and hemodynamic responses under the conditions investigated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/sports14110490
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cardiac and Hemodynamic Responses to Resistance Training Sessions with and Without Blood Flow Restriction Performed to Muscular Failure

Mário C. Espada, José M. Gamonales, Víctor Hernández-Beltrán, Tiago A. F. Almeida et al.
Sports
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Cardiac and Hemodynamic Responses to Resistance Training Sessions with and Without Blood Flow Restriction Performed to Muscular Failure

Mário C. Espada, José M. Gamonales, Víctor Hernández-Beltrán, Tiago A. F. Almeida, João Paulo Brito, Anderson Geremias Macedo, David Michel de Oliveira, Gabriel de Souza Zanini, Rafael Franco Soares Oliveira, Danilo A. Massini, Dalton Müller Pessôa Filho, Flávia A. de O. Tavares
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the acute cardiac and hemodynamic responses to high-intensity resistance training (HIRT), low-intensity resistance training (LIRT), and low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction (LIRT+BFR) during sessions composed of sequential exercises performed to muscular failure. Fourteen resistance-trained men (age: 21.8 ± 1.7 years; height: 178.3 ± 8.3 cm; body mass: 76.0 ± 8.1 kg) completed a repeated-measures crossover design in which each participant performed all three experimental conditions in a fixed, non-randomized order: HIRT (four sets at 70% 1RM), LIRT (four sets at 30% 1RM), and LIRT+BFR (four sets at 30% 1RM with a fixed cuff pressure of 80 mmHg), all executed in repetition-to-failure mode. Heart rate (HR), rate–pressure product (RPP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured at rest, immediately after each session, and 30 min post-exercise. At the end of the sessions, HIRT, LIRT, and LIRT+BFR all showed significant increases in HR, RPP, SBP, MAP, and DBP compared with resting values (p < 0.01), with no differences between protocols. Delta values (pre–post changes) were similar across protocols. Post-exercise, HR and RPP remained elevated compared with baseline in all protocols (p < 0.01), with no differences between them. SBP and MAP were reduced when compared with rest at 30 min post-exercise in HIRT, LIRT, and LIRT+BFR (p < 0.05), with no differences among protocols. For DBP, only LI showed a reduction compared with the rest (p < 0.01); however, LIRT+BFR values were significantly higher than HIRT (p < 0.01) and LIRT (p < 0.01). No statistically significant between-protocol differences were observed for the immediate post-exercise cardiac and hemodynamic responses under the conditions investigated.

SportsVol. 14(11)
University of Lisbon (PT), University of Évora (PT), Universidade Federal de Alfenas (BR), Universidade Federal de Jataí (BR), Life Quality Research Centre (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Setúbal (PT), Lusíada University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade Politécnica de Santarém (PT), Centro Interdisciplinar de Estudo da Performance Humana (PT), Universidad de Extremadura (ES), Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon