Prioritizing Impact: Cancers for Nanomedicine

Abstract From the vantage point of the oncology clinic, the barriers keeping promising nanomedicines from patients look different than they appear from the research bench. Despite decades of preclinical progress, few patients are treated with nanoparticle-based therapies. This gap has two sides: well-characterized scientific obstacles, and a less-discussed set of clinical barriers that even a high-performing nanomedicine must overcome. In this Perspective, written from the viewpoint of a practicing oncologist, I argue that patient-centered design can mitigate some of these barriers and identify new opportunities for nanomedicine. I outline four principles that prioritize clinical impact: synergizing with the standard of care, advancing immuno-oncology combinations, embracing rare cancers, and improving supportive care. Bridging this gap will require clinicians, engineers, life and physical scientists, and industry partners to work together and adopt shared principles that put patients first.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Nano Medicine
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnanomed.6c00236
Primary Topic
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prioritizing Impact: Cancers for Nanomedicine

Joelle P. Straehla
ACS Nano Medicine
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
article

Prioritizing Impact: Cancers for Nanomedicine

Joelle P. Straehla
article en

Abstract

Abstract From the vantage point of the oncology clinic, the barriers keeping promising nanomedicines from patients look different than they appear from the research bench. Despite decades of preclinical progress, few patients are treated with nanoparticle-based therapies. This gap has two sides: well-characterized scientific obstacles, and a less-discussed set of clinical barriers that even a high-performing nanomedicine must overcome. In this Perspective, written from the viewpoint of a practicing oncologist, I argue that patient-centered design can mitigate some of these barriers and identify new opportunities for nanomedicine. I outline four principles that prioritize clinical impact: synergizing with the standard of care, advancing immuno-oncology combinations, embracing rare cancers, and improving supportive care. Bridging this gap will require clinicians, engineers, life and physical scientists, and industry partners to work together and adopt shared principles that put patients first.

ACS Nano Medicine
University of Washington (US), Seattle Children's Research Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Prioritizing Impact: Cancers for Nanomedicine — Joelle P. Straehla · ACS Nano Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS