A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LINGUISTIC FEATURES OF MALE AND FEMALE CHARACTERS IN THE SELECTED VICTORIAN TEXTS

The study explores the connection of gender, language, and power dynamics in Victorian literature by analysing linguistic features of Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights and Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre. It applies Robin Lakoff’s “Deficit theory” to reveal how societal norms shape gender-specific use of language and support power hierarchies. The main focus of the study is the dialogues between central characters like Catherine Earnshaw, Heathcliff, Jane Eyre and Rochester. The research examines lexical choices, sentence structures, and tonal variations to see how their language acts to reflect or challenge patriarchal expectations. The Brontës' use of literary devices elicits struggles, linguistically, for freedom in rigid social structures. They do this by contrasting assertive, metaphor-rich male speech with the subtle, delicate simplicity of female characters. The analysis brings out differences in the use of verbs, politeness markers, and emotional expression between genders. The use of imperative language and abstract metaphors by male characters reflects their dominant and intellectual position. On the other hand, female voices who want to survive oppression often use expressive and complex language. In conversations, the Brontës blend different linguistic features to challenge gender stereotypes. This subverts Lakoff’s proposed female hesitancy. This study analytically takes note of linguistic features like hedges, tag questions, and intonation patterns in Victorian gender ideologies. The result reveals that characters who defy speech conventions face narrative consequences, emphasising the role of language as a tool of oppression and resistance. The qualitative comparative approach between the two novels further identifies divergent authorial approaches: Emily Brontë uses raw, elemental diction to depict gender fluidity, while Charlotte Brontë uses deliberate dialogue to critique intersecting social identities. The research demonstrates how sentence complexity, accurate words, and well-organised conversations produce implicit power dynamics by applying Lakoff’s theory to literary stylistics. This linguistic perspective situates the Brontës’ works as proto-feminist critiques of language constraints and offers a framework for reevaluating the functionality of gender in 19th-century literature beyond socio-political paradigms.