Driver distraction effects and explainable workload recognition in extra-long tunnels using visual, ECG, and vehicle-control features

To address driving distraction caused by reduced driver alertness in the middle sections of extra‑long highway tunnels, which poses a threat to driving safety, this study systematically examines the effects of manual, visual, and cognitive distraction. It investigates their influences on visual indicators, ECG signals, vehicle control performance, and subjective workload. Furthermore, this work constructs a high‑precision interpretable driving workload recognition model. Baseline and three distraction conditions were established in driving simulation experiments, with synchronized collection of multidimensional visual, ECG, vehicle control, and subjective data. Repeated‑measures ANOVA, kernel density estimation, and gaze distribution analysis were employed to examine distraction characteristics, and a LightGBM‑SHAP fusion model was constructed for workload recognition and feature contribution quantification. Manual and visual distraction both caused gaze deviation and reduced vehicle control stability, while cognitive distraction reduced drivers’ visual scanning of the surrounding environment. Manual distraction exerted a certain effect on ECG indicators, and its mean subjective workload was the highest. The LightGBM‑SHAP model outperformed traditional models in recognition accuracy. SHAP analysis identified LF/HF and SDLP as core features for high‑workload classification, and the model demonstrated both high recognition performance and interpretability. In this tunnel scenario, under experimentally induced distraction conditions, manual and visual distraction had certain effects on driving stability and drivers’ physiological indicators, while cognitive interference also altered driver workload and attention characteristics. The proposed model provides a high‑precision, interpretable method for driving state assessment and is applicable to distraction recognition and warning in tunnel scenarios.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34905170
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Driver distraction effects and explainable workload recognition in extra-long tunnels using visual, ECG, and vehicle-control features

Pengfei Wu, Zhigang Du, Yingping Tang, Shiming He et al.
Figshare
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Driver distraction effects and explainable workload recognition in extra-long tunnels using visual, ECG, and vehicle-control features

Pengfei Wu, Zhigang Du, Yingping Tang, Shiming He, Xu Ding
article en

Abstract

To address driving distraction caused by reduced driver alertness in the middle sections of extra‑long highway tunnels, which poses a threat to driving safety, this study systematically examines the effects of manual, visual, and cognitive distraction. It investigates their influences on visual indicators, ECG signals, vehicle control performance, and subjective workload. Furthermore, this work constructs a high‑precision interpretable driving workload recognition model. Baseline and three distraction conditions were established in driving simulation experiments, with synchronized collection of multidimensional visual, ECG, vehicle control, and subjective data. Repeated‑measures ANOVA, kernel density estimation, and gaze distribution analysis were employed to examine distraction characteristics, and a LightGBM‑SHAP fusion model was constructed for workload recognition and feature contribution quantification. Manual and visual distraction both caused gaze deviation and reduced vehicle control stability, while cognitive distraction reduced drivers’ visual scanning of the surrounding environment. Manual distraction exerted a certain effect on ECG indicators, and its mean subjective workload was the highest. The LightGBM‑SHAP model outperformed traditional models in recognition accuracy. SHAP analysis identified LF/HF and SDLP as core features for high‑workload classification, and the model demonstrated both high recognition performance and interpretability. In this tunnel scenario, under experimentally induced distraction conditions, manual and visual distraction had certain effects on driving stability and drivers’ physiological indicators, while cognitive interference also altered driver workload and attention characteristics. The proposed model provides a high‑precision, interpretable method for driving state assessment and is applicable to distraction recognition and warning in tunnel scenarios.

Figshare
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon