A new framework for linking process-level sustainability performance to economic loss in manufacturing

Purpose This study presents a framework that links process-level sustainability performance and economic loss analysis in manufacturing by integrating the triple bottom stream method (TBSM), a value-stream-oriented process-flow assessment framework, into the Lean Six Sigma-define–measure–analyze–improve–control (LSS-DMAIC) cycle. The purpose of this study is to provide a structured method for identifying how operational, environmental and social inefficiencies relate to financial outcomes and to support sustainable process improvement. Design/methodology/approach The proposed framework uses TBSM to evaluate operational, environmental and social sustainability performance. These dimensions are integrated into a Composite Performance Index (CPI) that represents overall manufacturing sustainability performance. A diagnostic sustainability-loss indicator is further used to assess sustainability-related deficiencies, while economic performance is evaluated through economic-loss analysis based on observed process and problem costs. The framework enables the identification of process-level inefficiencies across the operational, environmental and social dimensions while providing a separate assessment of economic consequences at the process level. It is subsequently operationalized through the LSS-DMAIC cycle to support structured process improvement. Findings In an Indonesian manufacturing SME, the initial TBSM assessment yielded a CPI of 64.17%, indicating acceptable overall sustainability performance; however, detailed process-level assessment and economic-loss evaluation revealed that several manufacturing processes still exhibited substantial operational, environmental and social deficiencies. After implementing improvement actions, the CPI increased to 78.92%, reflecting improvement across operational, environmental and social dimensions. The improvements generated an estimated gross monthly saving of US$4,807.38 and a net monthly financial benefit of US$3,780.49 after deducting operational costs. Originality/value Prior approaches often evaluate selected dimensions without providing an integrated assessment of operational, environmental and social sustainability performance alongside process-level economic consequences. To address this gap, this study introduces the TBSM, which integrates operational, environmental and social sustainability assessments into the CPI while examining economic loss through a separate economic-consequence analysis path. This framework enables a more structured assessment of sustainability performance and economic consequences at the process level. The proposed framework supports broader sustainability objectives, including Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 9 and SDG 12 while advancing integrated and system-oriented sustainability practices in manufacturing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlss-04-2026-0153
Primary Topic
Quality and Supply Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new framework for linking process-level sustainability performance to economic loss in manufacturing

Yeneneh Tamirat Negash, Fu‐Kwun Wang, Samuel Trinata Winnyarto
International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Quality and Supply Management
article

A new framework for linking process-level sustainability performance to economic loss in manufacturing

Yeneneh Tamirat Negash, Fu‐Kwun Wang, Samuel Trinata Winnyarto
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study presents a framework that links process-level sustainability performance and economic loss analysis in manufacturing by integrating the triple bottom stream method (TBSM), a value-stream-oriented process-flow assessment framework, into the Lean Six Sigma-define–measure–analyze–improve–control (LSS-DMAIC) cycle. The purpose of this study is to provide a structured method for identifying how operational, environmental and social inefficiencies relate to financial outcomes and to support sustainable process improvement. Design/methodology/approach The proposed framework uses TBSM to evaluate operational, environmental and social sustainability performance. These dimensions are integrated into a Composite Performance Index (CPI) that represents overall manufacturing sustainability performance. A diagnostic sustainability-loss indicator is further used to assess sustainability-related deficiencies, while economic performance is evaluated through economic-loss analysis based on observed process and problem costs. The framework enables the identification of process-level inefficiencies across the operational, environmental and social dimensions while providing a separate assessment of economic consequences at the process level. It is subsequently operationalized through the LSS-DMAIC cycle to support structured process improvement. Findings In an Indonesian manufacturing SME, the initial TBSM assessment yielded a CPI of 64.17%, indicating acceptable overall sustainability performance; however, detailed process-level assessment and economic-loss evaluation revealed that several manufacturing processes still exhibited substantial operational, environmental and social deficiencies. After implementing improvement actions, the CPI increased to 78.92%, reflecting improvement across operational, environmental and social dimensions. The improvements generated an estimated gross monthly saving of US$4,807.38 and a net monthly financial benefit of US$3,780.49 after deducting operational costs. Originality/value Prior approaches often evaluate selected dimensions without providing an integrated assessment of operational, environmental and social sustainability performance alongside process-level economic consequences. To address this gap, this study introduces the TBSM, which integrates operational, environmental and social sustainability assessments into the CPI while examining economic loss through a separate economic-consequence analysis path. This framework enables a more structured assessment of sustainability performance and economic consequences at the process level. The proposed framework supports broader sustainability objectives, including Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 9 and SDG 12 while advancing integrated and system-oriented sustainability practices in manufacturing.

International Journal of Lean Six Sigma
Asia University (TW), National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Quality and Supply Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon