Merely vs Sincerely Dead: How Donation After Circulatory Death (DCD) as Presently Performed Does Not Follow the Dead Donor Rule (DDR)

All living creatures experience death. In the past, for humans, death has been easy to define. According to the major religions, death occurs when the soul leaves the body. Since when this occurs is unknown and unknowable, religions have left it to science to declare when death occurs physiologically. While the use of technology such as the stethoscope have improved accuracy, resuscitative efforts and scientific study have shown that a person who is legally dead may not be irreversibly dead. There is a movement to change irreversible to permanent, making death a social construct so that organs may be obtained under the Dead Donor Rule. The change has grave consequences both for patients and the medical profession, where patients are seen more as generous organ donors than as vulnerable persons. Donation after Circulatory Death is an example where the merely permanently dying heart is resuscitated, and therefore the donor is not sincerely irreversibly dead, but still alive.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Linacre Quarterly
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639261496956
Primary Topic
Organ Donation and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Merely vs Sincerely Dead: How Donation After Circulatory Death (DCD) as Presently Performed Does Not Follow the Dead Donor Rule (DDR)

Cynthia Jones-Nosacek
The Linacre Quarterly
Organ Donation and Transplantation
article

Merely vs Sincerely Dead: How Donation After Circulatory Death (DCD) as Presently Performed Does Not Follow the Dead Donor Rule (DDR)

Cynthia Jones-Nosacek
article en

Abstract

All living creatures experience death. In the past, for humans, death has been easy to define. According to the major religions, death occurs when the soul leaves the body. Since when this occurs is unknown and unknowable, religions have left it to science to declare when death occurs physiologically. While the use of technology such as the stethoscope have improved accuracy, resuscitative efforts and scientific study have shown that a person who is legally dead may not be irreversibly dead. There is a movement to change irreversible to permanent, making death a social construct so that organs may be obtained under the Dead Donor Rule. The change has grave consequences both for patients and the medical profession, where patients are seen more as generous organ donors than as vulnerable persons. Donation after Circulatory Death is an example where the merely permanently dying heart is resuscitated, and therefore the donor is not sincerely irreversibly dead, but still alive.

The Linacre Quarterly
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Organ Donation and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon