Clinical outcomes after diaphragm plication for diaphragm paralysis: a single New Zealand centre retrospective cohort study

aim: The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes, including breathlessness, after diaphragm plication in patients with symptomatic diaphragm paralysis. methods: A retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing diaphragm plication at Christchurch Hospital between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 was conducted. Breathlessness was assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale, derived from clinic letters pre-operatively and at routine post-operative follow-up. Pre- and post-operative MRC scores were compared using paired non-parametric testing. Secondary outcomes included post-operative complications, 30-day readmission and 30- and 90-day mortality. results: There were 37 patients identified who underwent diaphragm plication during the study period. Paired pre- and postoperative MRC scores were available for 32 patients. Median pre-operative MRC score was three (interquartile range [IQR] 3–4), improving to two (IQR 1–2) post-operatively, representing a median improvement of two MRC grades (p<0.001). Breathlessness improved in 31/32 patients (97%), was unchanged in 1/32 (3%) and worsened in none. Post-operative pneumonia occurred in three out of 37 patients (8%), and eight of 37 patients (22%) were readmitted within 30 days. There was no mortality at 30 or 90 days. conclusion: Diaphragm plication was associated with substantial improvement in patient-reported breathlessness and acceptable short-term morbidity in selected symptomatic patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Medical Journal
Published
2026-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6343
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes after diaphragm plication for diaphragm paralysis: a single New Zealand centre retrospective cohort study

Akshat Saxena, Michael Daley, Harsh Singh, J B Kim
New Zealand Medical Journal
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

Clinical outcomes after diaphragm plication for diaphragm paralysis: a single New Zealand centre retrospective cohort study

Akshat Saxena, Michael Daley, Harsh Singh, J B Kim
article en

Abstract

aim: The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes, including breathlessness, after diaphragm plication in patients with symptomatic diaphragm paralysis. methods: A retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing diaphragm plication at Christchurch Hospital between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2022 was conducted. Breathlessness was assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale, derived from clinic letters pre-operatively and at routine post-operative follow-up. Pre- and post-operative MRC scores were compared using paired non-parametric testing. Secondary outcomes included post-operative complications, 30-day readmission and 30- and 90-day mortality. results: There were 37 patients identified who underwent diaphragm plication during the study period. Paired pre- and postoperative MRC scores were available for 32 patients. Median pre-operative MRC score was three (interquartile range [IQR] 3–4), improving to two (IQR 1–2) post-operatively, representing a median improvement of two MRC grades (p<0.001). Breathlessness improved in 31/32 patients (97%), was unchanged in 1/32 (3%) and worsened in none. Post-operative pneumonia occurred in three out of 37 patients (8%), and eight of 37 patients (22%) were readmitted within 30 days. There was no mortality at 30 or 90 days. conclusion: Diaphragm plication was associated with substantial improvement in patient-reported breathlessness and acceptable short-term morbidity in selected symptomatic patients.

New Zealand Medical JournalVol. 139(1645)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon