What can strong lensing recover in edge-on disc galaxies? A mock study based on TNG50 simulations

Strong gravitational lensing tightly constrains the projected mass within the Einstein aperture, but what else imaging alone can recover for edge-on disc lenses remains untested against known truth. We construct HST/ACS-like mock observations of 35 edge-on TNG50 disc galaxies selected to resemble lenses from the Sloan WFC Edge-on Late-type Lens Survey (SWELLS), and fit them with a five-stage Source-Light-and-Mass workflow in PyAutoLens; the final model represents the lens mass distribution by scaling the Multi-Gaussian Expansion (MGE) foreground-light template with a global mass-to-light ratio and adding a spherical NFW halo. Decomposed fits succeed for 21 of the 35 systems; in the other 14, coherent MGE lens-light residuals prevent reliable modelling. For the successful subset, the Einstein radius and the total aperture mass are recovered with normalised median absolute deviation (NMAD) scatters of 0.3% and 0.7%. The global projected mass-weighted slope has an NMAD scatter of 10.3%, smaller than that of the mass-sheet-invariant reduced deflection curvature $ξ$ (11.4%) and well below that of the local slope (40.7%), while the stellar and dark-matter aperture masses scatter by 15.1% and 108.8%. A 35-system true-light diagnostic using the exact input light gives component-mass scatters of 0.8% and 6.3%. Under these controlled assumptions, imaging constrains Einstein-scale total mass and global radial structure more reliably than local radial structure or the stellar-dark-matter decomposition.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2611.03084
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

What can strong lensing recover in edge-on disc galaxies? A mock study based on TNG50 simulations

Zheng Fang, Weipeng Lin, Ran Li, Xiaoyue Cao
arXiv (Cornell University)
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
preprint

What can strong lensing recover in edge-on disc galaxies? A mock study based on TNG50 simulations

Zheng Fang, Weipeng Lin, Ran Li, Xiaoyue Cao
preprint en

Abstract

Strong gravitational lensing tightly constrains the projected mass within the Einstein aperture, but what else imaging alone can recover for edge-on disc lenses remains untested against known truth. We construct HST/ACS-like mock observations of 35 edge-on TNG50 disc galaxies selected to resemble lenses from the Sloan WFC Edge-on Late-type Lens Survey (SWELLS), and fit them with a five-stage Source-Light-and-Mass workflow in PyAutoLens; the final model represents the lens mass distribution by scaling the Multi-Gaussian Expansion (MGE) foreground-light template with a global mass-to-light ratio and adding a spherical NFW halo. Decomposed fits succeed for 21 of the 35 systems; in the other 14, coherent MGE lens-light residuals prevent reliable modelling. For the successful subset, the Einstein radius and the total aperture mass are recovered with normalised median absolute deviation (NMAD) scatters of 0.3% and 0.7%. The global projected mass-weighted slope has an NMAD scatter of 10.3%, smaller than that of the mass-sheet-invariant reduced deflection curvature $ξ$ (11.4%) and well below that of the local slope (40.7%), while the stellar and dark-matter aperture masses scatter by 15.1% and 108.8%. A 35-system true-light diagnostic using the exact input light gives component-mass scatters of 0.8% and 6.3%. Under these controlled assumptions, imaging constrains Einstein-scale total mass and global radial structure more reliably than local radial structure or the stellar-dark-matter decomposition.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon