Screening as a Modeling Choice: How Deterministic and System-One Semantic Gates Shape Reconstructed Co-authorship Networks

Co-authorship networks built from institutional web pages are exposed to the risk of topological distortion and error propagation due to the heterogeneous data contained within HTML code and the presence of unstructured strings. In settings where large volumes of documentary records make exhaustive manual verification impractical, automated screening becomes necessary, and the rules used to select records may influence the resulting network topology. In this paper, we present two different approaches to address this problem. The first is the traditional approach that uses complex regular expressions to identify co-authorship strings (Method A); the second, instead, uses a new family of models called “System-One” models. This model allows us to analyze a text string and categorize it with the capabilities of generative AI, but without generating a single token (Method B). The model is useful for its capability to output probabilities across a fixed set of choices—in our case, TRUE, FALSE, and INSUFFICIENT—based on a set of instructions. To control how the model categorizes each string, we subsequently introduce a new policy called Method B-selective to isolate low-confidence or ambiguous decisions: |pT − pF | < 0.20 ∨ pI > 0.15. This analysis was conducted on 1,848 total bibliographic strings extracted from three university department websites. OpenAlex API services were implemented to resolve individual identities through the OpenAlex-ID, ORCID, and the profile webpage of each individual. The impact of the screening process depends on the HTML structure of the department: in PPA, where lists intermix publications, awards, and editorial work, Method A includes 87 single-authored papers (out of 166), whereas B-native filters out the noise—reducing the number of resolved papers to 98 while increasing the number of edges from 237 to 247. Furthermore, fixed-identity diagnostics reveal local fractures (one component split and 15 disconnected author pairs) that remain invisible to global graph metrics. Upstream screening is a substantive modeling choice, and typed semantic interfaces with explicit abstention offer a reproducible paradigm for Social Network Analysis based on heterogeneous web data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23917913
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Screening as a Modeling Choice: How Deterministic and System-One Semantic Gates Shape Reconstructed Co-authorship Networks

Jacopo Peracchio
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
preprint

Screening as a Modeling Choice: How Deterministic and System-One Semantic Gates Shape Reconstructed Co-authorship Networks

Jacopo Peracchio
preprint en

Abstract

Co-authorship networks built from institutional web pages are exposed to the risk of topological distortion and error propagation due to the heterogeneous data contained within HTML code and the presence of unstructured strings. In settings where large volumes of documentary records make exhaustive manual verification impractical, automated screening becomes necessary, and the rules used to select records may influence the resulting network topology. In this paper, we present two different approaches to address this problem. The first is the traditional approach that uses complex regular expressions to identify co-authorship strings (Method A); the second, instead, uses a new family of models called “System-One” models. This model allows us to analyze a text string and categorize it with the capabilities of generative AI, but without generating a single token (Method B). The model is useful for its capability to output probabilities across a fixed set of choices—in our case, TRUE, FALSE, and INSUFFICIENT—based on a set of instructions. To control how the model categorizes each string, we subsequently introduce a new policy called Method B-selective to isolate low-confidence or ambiguous decisions: |pT − pF | < 0.20 ∨ pI > 0.15. This analysis was conducted on 1,848 total bibliographic strings extracted from three university department websites. OpenAlex API services were implemented to resolve individual identities through the OpenAlex-ID, ORCID, and the profile webpage of each individual. The impact of the screening process depends on the HTML structure of the department: in PPA, where lists intermix publications, awards, and editorial work, Method A includes 87 single-authored papers (out of 166), whereas B-native filters out the noise—reducing the number of resolved papers to 98 while increasing the number of edges from 237 to 247. Furthermore, fixed-identity diagnostics reveal local fractures (one component split and 15 disconnected author pairs) that remain invisible to global graph metrics. Upstream screening is a substantive modeling choice, and typed semantic interfaces with explicit abstention offer a reproducible paradigm for Social Network Analysis based on heterogeneous web data.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Screening as a Modeling Choice: How Deterministic and System-One Semantic Gates Shape Reconstructed Co-authorship Networks — Jacopo Peracchio · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS