Assessment of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)-Chandrasur (Lepidium sativum L.) Intercropping Productivity Using Competitive Indices under Varying Moisture Regimes

A two-season field investigation conducted at Raipur, Chhattisgarh, during the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 rabi seasons examined chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and garden cress (Lepidium sativum L.) grown in replacement-series arrangements under three irrigation schedules. A split-plot design with three replications comprised no irrigation, irrigation at 35 days after sowing (DAS), and irrigation at 35 and 70 DAS as main-plot treatments, crossed with sole crops and 1:1, 2:1, 3:1 and 2:2 chickpea–garden cress row arrangements. Reported component seed-yield means were used to derive land equivalent ratios (LER), proportion-adjusted competitive ratios, aggressivity, relative crowding coefficients and actual yield loss indices. Across the two seasons, mean chickpea yield increased from 945.59 kg ha⁻¹ without irrigation to 1,347.15 kg ha⁻¹ with two irrigations. The 3:1 arrangement produced chickpea seed yields of 1,385.83 and 1,142.36 kg ha⁻¹ and garden cress yields of 420.73 and 570.74 kg ha⁻¹, respectively. Its LERs, obtained from treatment-mean yields, were 1.27 and 1.30. In contrast to interpretations based on unadjusted yield predominance, proportion-standardised competitive ratios for chickpea in the 3:1 arrangement were 0.83 and 0.62, indicating greater relative competitiveness of garden cress per unit sown share. The yield and index estimates suggest land-use complementarity, but the analyses of derived indices are descriptive because the replicate-level data required for uncertainty estimation were unavailable. Consequently, agronomic interpretations should be restricted to the seasons and environments studied.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environment and Climate Change
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2026/v16i115765
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)-Chandrasur (Lepidium sativum L.) Intercropping Productivity Using Competitive Indices under Varying Moisture Regimes

Hemlata Nirala, Sanjeev Gurjar, Mahanand Sahu, Sakshi Bajaj et al.
International Journal of Environment and Climate Change
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
article

Assessment of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)-Chandrasur (Lepidium sativum L.) Intercropping Productivity Using Competitive Indices under Varying Moisture Regimes

Hemlata Nirala, Sanjeev Gurjar, Mahanand Sahu, Sakshi Bajaj, U. K. Dhruw
article en

Abstract

A two-season field investigation conducted at Raipur, Chhattisgarh, during the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 rabi seasons examined chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and garden cress (Lepidium sativum L.) grown in replacement-series arrangements under three irrigation schedules. A split-plot design with three replications comprised no irrigation, irrigation at 35 days after sowing (DAS), and irrigation at 35 and 70 DAS as main-plot treatments, crossed with sole crops and 1:1, 2:1, 3:1 and 2:2 chickpea–garden cress row arrangements. Reported component seed-yield means were used to derive land equivalent ratios (LER), proportion-adjusted competitive ratios, aggressivity, relative crowding coefficients and actual yield loss indices. Across the two seasons, mean chickpea yield increased from 945.59 kg ha⁻¹ without irrigation to 1,347.15 kg ha⁻¹ with two irrigations. The 3:1 arrangement produced chickpea seed yields of 1,385.83 and 1,142.36 kg ha⁻¹ and garden cress yields of 420.73 and 570.74 kg ha⁻¹, respectively. Its LERs, obtained from treatment-mean yields, were 1.27 and 1.30. In contrast to interpretations based on unadjusted yield predominance, proportion-standardised competitive ratios for chickpea in the 3:1 arrangement were 0.83 and 0.62, indicating greater relative competitiveness of garden cress per unit sown share. The yield and index estimates suggest land-use complementarity, but the analyses of derived indices are descriptive because the replicate-level data required for uncertainty estimation were unavailable. Consequently, agronomic interpretations should be restricted to the seasons and environments studied.

International Journal of Environment and Climate ChangeVol. 16(11)
Indira Gandhi Agricultural University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon