A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Spatio-temporal Infectious Disease Forecasting

Abstract Infectious diseases spread across space and time, yet most artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models treat forecasting as a purely temporal problem. We conducted a scoping review of AI/ML methods for spatio-temporal infectious disease forecasting, searching five databases on 20th November 2025. We included 93 studies published between 2018 and 2026, spanning 14 infectious diseases. Recurrent neural networks (46%) and graph neural networks (39%) dominated, with hybrid mechanistic-ML models growing steadily after 2022. Over 30 distinct error metrics were used, with no shared benchmarks, making cross-study comparison infeasible. Uncertainty was quantified in only 19% of studies, external validation in 13%, and 71% did not share code openly. Forecasts were concentrated in middle- and high-income countries, and only one study conducted fairness analysis. Addressing these gaps in evaluation standardisation, transparency, and equity is essential for AI/ML forecasting to inform public health policy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-10547287/v1
Primary Topic
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Spatio-temporal Infectious Disease Forecasting

Robert Challen, León Danon, Mengyan Zhang, Zixuan Liu et al.
Research Square
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
preprint

A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Spatio-temporal Infectious Disease Forecasting

Robert Challen, León Danon, Mengyan Zhang, Zixuan Liu, Amber Frankie Evelyn Palmer
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Infectious diseases spread across space and time, yet most artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models treat forecasting as a purely temporal problem. We conducted a scoping review of AI/ML methods for spatio-temporal infectious disease forecasting, searching five databases on 20th November 2025. We included 93 studies published between 2018 and 2026, spanning 14 infectious diseases. Recurrent neural networks (46%) and graph neural networks (39%) dominated, with hybrid mechanistic-ML models growing steadily after 2022. Over 30 distinct error metrics were used, with no shared benchmarks, making cross-study comparison infeasible. Uncertainty was quantified in only 19% of studies, external validation in 13%, and 71% did not share code openly. Forecasts were concentrated in middle- and high-income countries, and only one study conducted fairness analysis. Addressing these gaps in evaluation standardisation, transparency, and equity is essential for AI/ML forecasting to inform public health policy.

Research Square
University of Bristol (GB)
Data-Driven Disease Surveillance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon