Towards bridging the gap between Antarctic subglacial boundary conditions and ice-sheet model parameterization

Abstract. The geology of Antarctica exerts a first-order control on ice-sheet dynamics by shaping the subglacial landscape and regulating basal friction, thermal profile, hydrology, and sediment distribution. These bed conditions influence where ice flows, how fast it moves, and how it responds to a changing climate. Yet most ice-sheet models incorporate geologic information only indirectly, typically as smoothed topography and simplified representations of basal processes. This incomplete capturing of geological information in ice-sheet models can be attributed to observational gaps, an incomplete community understanding of subglacial processes, and the need to simplify processes in ice-sheet models. As such, there is an opportunity to enhance communication and translation between geology and modeling disciplines, which will help improve our understanding of the thresholds and instabilities in Antarctic ice-sheet dynamics. Here, we discuss key subglacial geological conditions and processes and how they are used (or not used) in ice-sheet models. We highlight the disconnect between geological and physical interpretations of subglacial conditions and discuss possible strategies that will help bridge the gap between these disciplines as part of investigations of changing ice-sheet behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5815
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Towards bridging the gap between Antarctic subglacial boundary conditions and ice-sheet model parameterization

Robert O. Law, Guy J. G. Paxman, Anna Ruth W. Halberstadt, Sophie Nowicki et al.
Cryospheric studies and observations
preprint

Towards bridging the gap between Antarctic subglacial boundary conditions and ice-sheet model parameterization

Robert O. Law, Guy J. G. Paxman, Anna Ruth W. Halberstadt, Sophie Nowicki, Anya M. Reading, Yasmina M. Martos, JA Halpin, Tobias Stål, Ryan A. Venturelli, Emma Johanne MacKie, Lu Li, Stewart S. R. Jamieson, Dougal Hansen, Felicity S. McCormack, Maximilian Lowe, Jeremy C. Ely, Alan Aitken, Niya Shao, Michael Field, Kirsty Tinto, Eliza Dawson
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract. The geology of Antarctica exerts a first-order control on ice-sheet dynamics by shaping the subglacial landscape and regulating basal friction, thermal profile, hydrology, and sediment distribution. These bed conditions influence where ice flows, how fast it moves, and how it responds to a changing climate. Yet most ice-sheet models incorporate geologic information only indirectly, typically as smoothed topography and simplified representations of basal processes. This incomplete capturing of geological information in ice-sheet models can be attributed to observational gaps, an incomplete community understanding of subglacial processes, and the need to simplify processes in ice-sheet models. As such, there is an opportunity to enhance communication and translation between geology and modeling disciplines, which will help improve our understanding of the thresholds and instabilities in Antarctic ice-sheet dynamics. Here, we discuss key subglacial geological conditions and processes and how they are used (or not used) in ice-sheet models. We highlight the disconnect between geological and physical interpretations of subglacial conditions and discuss possible strategies that will help bridge the gap between these disciplines as part of investigations of changing ice-sheet behavior.

University of Florida (US)
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon