Performance and Physiological Responses to Strength Training Programs in Elite Judo Athletes

ABSTRACT: Campos, BT, Rodrigues, JGdS, Cal Abad, CC, Bachi, ALL, dos Santos, CMM, Tritto, AC, Kons, RL, Penna, EM, and Prado, LS. Performance and physiological responses to strength training programs in elite judo athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-This study compared the effects of 2 short-term strength training models, block planning (BP) and undulating planning (UP), on performance, physiological, and perceptual responses in elite judo athletes. We hypothesized that BP would induce greater physiological strain due to the concentration of training stimuli. Eighteen judokas (14 men and 4 women) were randomly assigned to BP (n = 9) or UP (n = 9) for 4 weeks, performing 6 weekly strength sessions alongside technical-tactical training. Performance outcomes included countermovement jump (CMJ), muscle power (back squat and bent-over row), and the Special Judo Fitness Test (SJFT). Monitoring variables included internal load, heart rate variability (HRV), and well-being, while physiological markers included creatine kinase, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and cortisol. Data were analyzed using 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA (p < 0.05). Both groups improved SJFT performance (p < 0.01), with no between-group differences. Block planning increased lower-limb peak power (p = 0.01; d = 0.90), whereas UP showed no meaningful change. Upper-limb power and CMJ did not change in either group. Internal load showed different temporal patterns between models. Block planning presented higher HRVcv values (p = 0.04), indicating greater autonomic perturbation. Creatine kinase and TNF-α increased over time in both groups (p ≤ 0.05), while cortisol showed an interaction without clear post hoc differences. In conclusion, BP improved lower-limb power but increased physiological strain, whereas UP elicited similar judo-specific improvements with lower recovery demands. These findings highlight the importance of training organization for balancing performance and recovery in elite judo athletes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005727
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance and Physiological Responses to Strength Training Programs in Elite Judo Athletes

João Gabriel Silveira Rodrigues, André Luís Lacerda Bachi, Aline C. Tritto, Bruno Teobaldo Campos et al.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

Performance and Physiological Responses to Strength Training Programs in Elite Judo Athletes

João Gabriel Silveira Rodrigues, André Luís Lacerda Bachi, Aline C. Tritto, Bruno Teobaldo Campos, Luciano Sales Prado, Rafael Lima Kons, Eduardo Macedo Penna, César C. Cal Abad, Cesar M M Dos Santos
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Campos, BT, Rodrigues, JGdS, Cal Abad, CC, Bachi, ALL, dos Santos, CMM, Tritto, AC, Kons, RL, Penna, EM, and Prado, LS. Performance and physiological responses to strength training programs in elite judo athletes. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-This study compared the effects of 2 short-term strength training models, block planning (BP) and undulating planning (UP), on performance, physiological, and perceptual responses in elite judo athletes. We hypothesized that BP would induce greater physiological strain due to the concentration of training stimuli. Eighteen judokas (14 men and 4 women) were randomly assigned to BP (n = 9) or UP (n = 9) for 4 weeks, performing 6 weekly strength sessions alongside technical-tactical training. Performance outcomes included countermovement jump (CMJ), muscle power (back squat and bent-over row), and the Special Judo Fitness Test (SJFT). Monitoring variables included internal load, heart rate variability (HRV), and well-being, while physiological markers included creatine kinase, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and cortisol. Data were analyzed using 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA (p < 0.05). Both groups improved SJFT performance (p < 0.01), with no between-group differences. Block planning increased lower-limb peak power (p = 0.01; d = 0.90), whereas UP showed no meaningful change. Upper-limb power and CMJ did not change in either group. Internal load showed different temporal patterns between models. Block planning presented higher HRVcv values (p = 0.04), indicating greater autonomic perturbation. Creatine kinase and TNF-α increased over time in both groups (p ≤ 0.05), while cortisol showed an interaction without clear post hoc differences. In conclusion, BP improved lower-limb power but increased physiological strain, whereas UP elicited similar judo-specific improvements with lower recovery demands. These findings highlight the importance of training organization for balancing performance and recovery in elite judo athletes.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais (BR), Centro Universitário das Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas (BR), Universidade de Santo Amaro (BR), Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon