Inclusive Queer Identities and Teen Dating Violence: Are All Youth at Equal Risk?

Research on teen dating violence (TDV) has largely relied on broad sexual and gender minority categories, limiting understanding of heterogeneity across identities. Using data from the Teen Dating Experiences Survey ( n = 837), this study examines physical, psychological, cyber, and sexual dating violence victimization and perpetration across inclusive sexual and gender identities. Heterosexual and cisgender youth reported significantly higher rates of dating violence than sexual and gender minority youth across multiple forms of violence, while pansexual, asexual, and genderqueer youth reported the lowest rates. No significant differences emerged between transgender and non-transgender youth. These findings indicate the importance of inclusive measurement and disaggregating sexual and gender identities to identify patterns in adolescent dating violence that may be obscured by broad identity categories and to inform theory, prevention, and intervention efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Youth & Society
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x261500112
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusive Queer Identities and Teen Dating Violence: Are All Youth at Equal Risk?

Gabriel Ancil Rangazas
Youth & Society
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Inclusive Queer Identities and Teen Dating Violence: Are All Youth at Equal Risk?

Gabriel Ancil Rangazas
article en

Abstract

Research on teen dating violence (TDV) has largely relied on broad sexual and gender minority categories, limiting understanding of heterogeneity across identities. Using data from the Teen Dating Experiences Survey ( n = 837), this study examines physical, psychological, cyber, and sexual dating violence victimization and perpetration across inclusive sexual and gender identities. Heterosexual and cisgender youth reported significantly higher rates of dating violence than sexual and gender minority youth across multiple forms of violence, while pansexual, asexual, and genderqueer youth reported the lowest rates. No significant differences emerged between transgender and non-transgender youth. These findings indicate the importance of inclusive measurement and disaggregating sexual and gender identities to identify patterns in adolescent dating violence that may be obscured by broad identity categories and to inform theory, prevention, and intervention efforts.

Youth & Society
University of California, Irvine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Inclusive Queer Identities and Teen Dating Violence: Are All Youth at Equal Risk? — Gabriel Ancil Rangazas · Youth & Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS