Flow features and jet formation in droplet–bubble collision

We investigate head-on droplet–bubble collisions in a quiescent, surfactant-free viscous liquid using three-dimensional volume-of-fluid simulations. By systematically varying the bubble-to-droplet radius ratio ( 0.5 less than or equals upper Delta less than or equals 2 0.5 ≤ Δ ≤ 2 $0.5\le \varDelta \le 2$ ) and Weber number ( 3 less than or equals italic We less than or equals 270 3 ≤ We ≤ 270 $3\le \textit{We}\le 270$ ) at small Ohnesorge number ( italic Oh less than 1 Oh < 1 $ \textit{Oh}\lt 1$ ), we identify the mechanisms governing interfacial deformation, attachment, jet formation and vortex evolution during an isolated collision. Four distinct collision regimes emerge, ranging from oscillatory attachment to jet-mediated penetration and coupled toroidal deformations. A transition from weak- to inertia-dominated dynamics occurs at a critical Weber number of italic We almost equals 23 We ≈ 23 $ \textit{We}\approx 23$ , nearly independent of upper Delta Δ $\varDelta$ , whereas the onset of complete jet penetration depends strongly on the size ratio. Comparison with the unsteady Oseen solution for an impulsively accelerated rigid sphere establishes a hydrodynamic baseline that isolates the effects of interface mobility and deformation, revealing the progressive emergence of toroidal vortices, interfacial oscillations and jetting. An energy analysis demonstrates that jet formation is controlled by the conversion of impact kinetic energy into surface energy, yielding a characteristic jet velocity comparable to the impact speed, while viscous dissipation suppresses jetting above a critical Ohnesorge number scaling as italic Oh Subscript c Baseline tilde upper W e Superscript negative 1 divided by 2 Oh c ∼ W e − 1 / 2 $ \textit{Oh}_c\sim We^{-1/2}$ . These results provide a unified physical framework linking inertia, capillarity and vortex dynamics in elementary droplet–bubble interactions, offering predictive insight into multiphase processes such as flotation, aeration, emulsification and liquid–liquid separation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2026.12200
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Flow features and jet formation in droplet–bubble collision

Arahata Senapati, Arnab Atta, Gaurav Singh, Gautam Biswas et al.
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
article

Flow features and jet formation in droplet–bubble collision

Arahata Senapati, Arnab Atta, Gaurav Singh, Gautam Biswas, Rajaram Lakkaraju
article en

Abstract

We investigate head-on droplet–bubble collisions in a quiescent, surfactant-free viscous liquid using three-dimensional volume-of-fluid simulations. By systematically varying the bubble-to-droplet radius ratio ( 0.5 less than or equals upper Delta less than or equals 2 0.5 ≤ Δ ≤ 2 $0.5\le \varDelta \le 2$ ) and Weber number ( 3 less than or equals italic We less than or equals 270 3 ≤ We ≤ 270 $3\le \textit{We}\le 270$ ) at small Ohnesorge number ( italic Oh less than 1 Oh < 1 $ \textit{Oh}\lt 1$ ), we identify the mechanisms governing interfacial deformation, attachment, jet formation and vortex evolution during an isolated collision. Four distinct collision regimes emerge, ranging from oscillatory attachment to jet-mediated penetration and coupled toroidal deformations. A transition from weak- to inertia-dominated dynamics occurs at a critical Weber number of italic We almost equals 23 We ≈ 23 $ \textit{We}\approx 23$ , nearly independent of upper Delta Δ $\varDelta$ , whereas the onset of complete jet penetration depends strongly on the size ratio. Comparison with the unsteady Oseen solution for an impulsively accelerated rigid sphere establishes a hydrodynamic baseline that isolates the effects of interface mobility and deformation, revealing the progressive emergence of toroidal vortices, interfacial oscillations and jetting. An energy analysis demonstrates that jet formation is controlled by the conversion of impact kinetic energy into surface energy, yielding a characteristic jet velocity comparable to the impact speed, while viscous dissipation suppresses jetting above a critical Ohnesorge number scaling as italic Oh Subscript c Baseline tilde upper W e Superscript negative 1 divided by 2 Oh c ∼ W e − 1 / 2 $ \textit{Oh}_c\sim We^{-1/2}$ . These results provide a unified physical framework linking inertia, capillarity and vortex dynamics in elementary droplet–bubble interactions, offering predictive insight into multiphase processes such as flotation, aeration, emulsification and liquid–liquid separation.

Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 1046
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN), Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon