A Review of Handwritten and Printed Text Segmentation: Problem Formulation, Benchmarks, Methods, and Open Challenges

Document image analysis transforms digitized documents into machine-readable representations. Within this field, Handwritten and Printed Text Segmentation (HPTS) separates handwritten strokes from printed text in mixed document images and supports downstream tasks such as optical character recognition, form understanding, and historical document restoration. This paper presents a structured narrative review of representative HPTS studies from four perspectives: problem formulation, methodological evolution, data resources and evaluation, and open challenges. We first clarify the technical scope, output representations, and objectives of HPTS, and then trace representative methods from multi-stage pipelines based on handcrafted features to deep learning-based methods. Beyond tracing methodological progress, we analyze the empirical foundations of HPTS, focusing on how dataset construction, annotation design, benchmark coverage, and evaluation protocols affect the validity and cross-study comparability of reported results. We characterize representative datasets in terms of document domain, construction strategy, annotation granularity, label ontology, and validation scope. We then assess benchmark reuse across representative studies and compare published results only under compatible experimental settings. The analysis reveals that datasets with dense annotations for handwritten–printed overlap remain scarce and that private or study-specific data are still widely used. Differences in label spaces, data splits, prediction targets, and evaluation metrics therefore prevent a reliable field-wide ranking of existing methods. Based on these observations, we highlight several open challenges for future HPTS research, including limited benchmark diversity, inconsistent annotation and evaluation protocols, insufficient cross-domain generalization, and limited integration with downstream document-intelligence tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/data11110291
Primary Topic
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Review of Handwritten and Printed Text Segmentation: Problem Formulation, Benchmarks, Methods, and Open Challenges

Minjuan Zhu, Lei Zhang, Jianwei Zhang, Dong Li et al.
Data
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
article

A Review of Handwritten and Printed Text Segmentation: Problem Formulation, Benchmarks, Methods, and Open Challenges

Minjuan Zhu, Lei Zhang, Jianwei Zhang, Dong Li, Jun Qi, Rui Gao, Zhixian Lu, Chang Liu, Yue Huang, Nuo Cheng, Jiangwen Tang
article en

Abstract

Document image analysis transforms digitized documents into machine-readable representations. Within this field, Handwritten and Printed Text Segmentation (HPTS) separates handwritten strokes from printed text in mixed document images and supports downstream tasks such as optical character recognition, form understanding, and historical document restoration. This paper presents a structured narrative review of representative HPTS studies from four perspectives: problem formulation, methodological evolution, data resources and evaluation, and open challenges. We first clarify the technical scope, output representations, and objectives of HPTS, and then trace representative methods from multi-stage pipelines based on handcrafted features to deep learning-based methods. Beyond tracing methodological progress, we analyze the empirical foundations of HPTS, focusing on how dataset construction, annotation design, benchmark coverage, and evaluation protocols affect the validity and cross-study comparability of reported results. We characterize representative datasets in terms of document domain, construction strategy, annotation granularity, label ontology, and validation scope. We then assess benchmark reuse across representative studies and compare published results only under compatible experimental settings. The analysis reveals that datasets with dense annotations for handwritten–printed overlap remain scarce and that private or study-specific data are still widely used. Differences in label spaces, data splits, prediction targets, and evaluation metrics therefore prevent a reliable field-wide ranking of existing methods. Based on these observations, we highlight several open challenges for future HPTS research, including limited benchmark diversity, inconsistent annotation and evaluation protocols, insufficient cross-domain generalization, and limited integration with downstream document-intelligence tasks.

DataVol. 11(11)
Qinghai University (CN), Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN), Sichuan University (CN), National Institute of Measurement and Testing Technology (CN), Chengdu University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon