Enhancing Operational Flexibility of Island Wind–Solar Systems Under Climate Disturbances: A Feedback-Based Adaptive Governance Perspective

Island power systems are highly exposed to climate disturbances, while conventional energy planning often treats governance arrangements as exogenous conditions and gives limited attention to their role in long-term system resilience. This study develops a system dynamics model to examine how technological improvement and adaptive governance affect the long-term performance of an island clean-energy system under alternative climate-stress conditions. The model contains four state variables: installed capacity, grid-integration capacity, cumulative climate-induced capacity loss, and institutional learning. Publicly available energy, disaster, recovery, and policy information from Hainan, China, is used to inform historical trend reproduction, model assumptions, and scenario design. Five scenarios are evaluated through 2050, including a baseline scenario, a stylized high-climate-stress scenario, a technology-only scenario, a governance-feedback scenario, and a combined technology-and-governance scenario. Under the high-climate-stress scenario, the installed-capacity index decreases by 23.5% relative to the baseline trajectory, while LPSP increases from 2.5% to 5.8% and the cumulative climate-loss index rises from 100 to 187. The governance-feedback scenario reduces LPSP to 3.1% and the cumulative climate-loss index to 132, whereas the combined scenario further improves these indicators to 2.8% and 124, respectively. Relative to the technology-only scenario S3, the combined technology-and-governance scenario S5 further reduces the cumulative climate-loss index by approximately 20.5% and LPSP by 33.3%. These scenario results suggest that governance-oriented feedback can complement technological measures by strengthening investment responsiveness, institutional learning, and post-disturbance recovery. The proposed framework provides a feedback-based adaptive governance perspective for examining climate resilience in island clean-energy systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Processes
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/pr14213551
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Operational Flexibility of Island Wind–Solar Systems Under Climate Disturbances: A Feedback-Based Adaptive Governance Perspective

盧琬靖, Tang Xinfa
Processes
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Enhancing Operational Flexibility of Island Wind–Solar Systems Under Climate Disturbances: A Feedback-Based Adaptive Governance Perspective

盧琬靖, Tang Xinfa
article en

Abstract

Island power systems are highly exposed to climate disturbances, while conventional energy planning often treats governance arrangements as exogenous conditions and gives limited attention to their role in long-term system resilience. This study develops a system dynamics model to examine how technological improvement and adaptive governance affect the long-term performance of an island clean-energy system under alternative climate-stress conditions. The model contains four state variables: installed capacity, grid-integration capacity, cumulative climate-induced capacity loss, and institutional learning. Publicly available energy, disaster, recovery, and policy information from Hainan, China, is used to inform historical trend reproduction, model assumptions, and scenario design. Five scenarios are evaluated through 2050, including a baseline scenario, a stylized high-climate-stress scenario, a technology-only scenario, a governance-feedback scenario, and a combined technology-and-governance scenario. Under the high-climate-stress scenario, the installed-capacity index decreases by 23.5% relative to the baseline trajectory, while LPSP increases from 2.5% to 5.8% and the cumulative climate-loss index rises from 100 to 187. The governance-feedback scenario reduces LPSP to 3.1% and the cumulative climate-loss index to 132, whereas the combined scenario further improves these indicators to 2.8% and 124, respectively. Relative to the technology-only scenario S3, the combined technology-and-governance scenario S5 further reduces the cumulative climate-loss index by approximately 20.5% and LPSP by 33.3%. These scenario results suggest that governance-oriented feedback can complement technological measures by strengthening investment responsiveness, institutional learning, and post-disturbance recovery. The proposed framework provides a feedback-based adaptive governance perspective for examining climate resilience in island clean-energy systems.

ProcessesVol. 14(21)
Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Enhancing Operational Flexibility of Island Wind–Solar Systems Under Climate Disturbances: A Feedback-Based Adaptive Governance Perspective — 盧琬靖, Tang Xinfa · Processes (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS